forums

What We've Seen is What We'll Get

Consigliere said:
Hey Bro,

A few things:

1. Mark Richt was hired by our decision makers because they're incompetent. Not because he averaged X losses per season. Our decision makers didn't have a plan, they never have a plan (besides the self-inflicted cancer approach).

2. The problem has and is our decision makers. Our decision makers have been nothing but consistent...

a. 4 straight unnecessary extensions,
b. 3 straight atrocious hires,
c. 3 straight buyouts (each too late) and we wait for number 4,
d. Our current AD ***s trannys, needed 5 years to graduate Minnesota State Mankato, and fell a$s backwards into the position, and
e. It has been ~15 years from our last truly relevant season.

Consistency.

3. Nothing will likely change until the process changes. What does that mean? It starts with bringing in a competent, passionate AD with autonomy. Just a heads up, our tranny ***ing incompetent puppet, is not that guy.

4. Why does it matter what Mark Richt thinks and whether or not UM is pleased?
Click to expand...

Dead on!! On Point!!!! The process and its orchestrators has to change, otherwise SAME RESULTS.
 
Advertisement
Consigliere said:
I don't see any answer.
Click to expand...


"The main issue is that UM's hiring process is flawed. During our last HC hiring process, we interviewed Dan Mullen, now UF's successful first year coach, but UM Admin. thought, as I recall, that "He was too ****y". Got news for you folks, is Saban ****y? Is Meyer ****y? is Dabo ****y? There's a trend here folks, successful HC's tend to be ****y!! Mullen took a bad program and turned them into winners overnight!

We need an AD that know what the **** he is doing, specially in hiring successful people".
 
CaneMountain08 said:
I think this is what most of us thought. We made excuses for him (UGA didn't let him run his own offense, turned him into a CEO, tied his hands, etc etc).

At the end of the day, UGA never got over the hump under Richt for a reason...he really is what much of their fanbase said he is.
Click to expand...

MR is who we thought he was.
 
Consigliere said:
In addition to not be qualified to do that (the AD), he doesn't have the power to do it. He is a puppet.
Click to expand...

The root cause of all of UM's football issues is our AD. Wasn't he the one that hired MR? Wasn't he the one that extended MR? Guess what folks, he is either very stupid, ignorant, blind or a combination of all.
 
Itiswhatitis said:
The root cause of all of UM's football issues is our AD. Wasn't he the one that hired MR? Wasn't he the one that extended MR? Guess what folks, he is either very stupid, ignorant, blind or a combination of all.
Click to expand...

He is a puppet. That is why I am explaining this thing about the process.
 
Consigliere said:
I don't see any answer.
Click to expand...

The main issue is that UM's hiring process is flawed. During our last HC hiring process, we interviewed Dan Mullen, now UF's successful first year coach, but UM Admin. thought, as I recall, that "He was too ****y". Got news for you folks, is Saban ****y? Is Meyer ****y? is Dabo ****y? There's a trend here folks, successful HC's tend to be ****y!! Mullen took a bad program and turned them into winners overnight!

We need an AD that know what the **** he is doing, specially in hiring successful people.
 
Consigliere said:
Hey Bro,

A few things:

1. Mark Richt was hired by our decision makers because they're incompetent. Not because he averaged X losses per season. Our decision makers didn't have a plan, they never have a plan (besides the self-inflicted cancer approach).

2. The problem has and is our decision makers. Our decision makers have been nothing but consistent...

a. 4 straight unnecessary extensions,
b. 3 straight atrocious hires,
c. 3 straight buyouts (each too late) and we wait for number 4,
d. Our current AD ***s trannys, needed 5 years to graduate Minnesota State Mankato, and fell a$s backwards into the position, and
e. It has been ~15 years from our last truly relevant season.

Consistency.

3. Nothing will likely change until the process changes. What does that mean? It starts with bringing in a competent, passionate AD with autonomy. Just a heads up, our tranny ***ing incompetent puppet, is not that guy.

4. Why does it matter what Mark Richt thinks and whether or not UM is pleased?
Click to expand...
nice post, honest and fair
 
Advertisement
firstandcanes said:
He should be gone now, but our AD has the balls of a prepubescent child.
Click to expand...

Blake has balls, they're just only near him when his mandingo wife is pegging him
FB_IMG_1543181476446.webp
 
Back
Top