I will go:
- It seems clear the institution thinks 9-3 is acceptable, and is confused/frustrated/irritated at/by fans who expect more. It seems equally clear that this situation has the potential to become toxic given the importance of football in so fla and the expectations of fans.
- If we want 9-3 we should hire a capable manager/evaluator without heroic expectations and support him with a solid staff. Candidates who fancy themselves rising stars are problematic if they don’t succeed.
- If we want to compete for the playoffs, we need a true program builder. Someone who can put together a great staff, who can EVALUATE talent really well and recruit really well and sell the program to kids, assistants and boosters. Someone who can put together an innovative, cutting edge team schematically, that matches our talent base and culture. Someone who is driven to win and won’t be okay with less than that.
- To be a 9-3 team, we need stability, patience and a well run program.
- To be 11-1, we need a coach who delivers on the things I noted. We also need to figure out how to compete with $EC bags.
- Our only asset is local talent proximity, and it is starting to work against us as the program is coming to be known as a joke.
So what matters? If we want to compete nationally, it’s....
- NOT UM connections
- NOT ‘ceo type’
- NOT looks the part
It’s:
- Experience: Must have had proven head coaching success, building (ideally) or running a legit program for long enough to assess
- Capabilities: Schematic innovator on one side of the ball (not someone wed to UM’s past); can bring together a talented staff, can be a very good evaluator of talent
- Personal Traits: leader, driven, ambitious, disciplined, energetic, can sell his vision and the program to all constituencies; hands on, not a delegator, not on downside of career, not looking to retire
- Cultural fit: must get and embrace the type of athletes and football our recruiting base represents, and the brashness of so fla. JJ got this, and he came from Oklahoma State.