I know that ain’t who I think it is at #7 lol
2 ACC
9 SEC
8 B1G
5 B12
1 Indy
These idiots have no idea how the 9 game conference schedules will impact their polls. They also haven't followed the money very well.
SEC is getting weaker by the year. B12 has just as many teams with money and willing to spend it as the SEC/B1G. ACC has two teams with money and is willing to spend it.
B1G:
Indiana(new QB and a ton of talent gone, big portal class),
Michigan(new coach),
USC, UW, Oregon (new OC/DC),
OSU (new OC or Day),
Minnesota, maybe PSU, Iowa, Illinois
SEC:
OU, UGA, Texas, Texas AM,
Bama (new QB, bad along the lines),
LSU (new QB and staff, trash OL), Ole Miss (qb? and new staff, lots of lost talent), TN (new QB, improved D/new DC),
B12:
BYU, TT, Houston,
Arizona, Utah. ASU- QB? OkSt- I see a big improvement coming.
ACC:
SMU, Miami, UL, Uva- no qb?, Duke- no qb, GT- no qb/new OC, NCSt- can they take a step?, Pitt- can they replace some of the talent that left? VT and Stanford are the two I could see having improved results.
ND
That is 22 of 25.
SEC will struggle to have 8 teams with 8+ wins just due to the scheduling. Likely 7 worth ranking, but who?
ACC will have 1-2 more out of the blue.
G5 - expect 2 to get ranked even after the blowouts in the CFP.