We simply don't have the system for Kayaa. Put him on the 2000 or 2001 team and Kayaa probably has better stats than Dorsey.
Essentially for Kayaa to be effective, you need a dominate offensive line good wideouts and running backs.
He can't extend plays and with our poor offensive line play he simply is not a good fit for UM. His NFL career will look much better than his college
We simply don't have the system for Kayaa. Put him on the 2000 or 2001 team and Kayaa probably has better stats than Dorsey.
Essentially for Kayaa to be effective, you need a dominate offensive line good wideouts and running backs.
He can't extend plays and with out poor offensive line play he simply is not a good fit for UM. His NFL career will look much better than his college
We simply don't have the system for Kayaa. Put him on the 2000 or 2001 team and Kayaa probably has better stats than Dorsey.
Essentially for Kayaa to be effective, you need a dominate offensive line good wideouts and running backs.
He can't extend plays and with out poor offensive line play he simply is not a good fit for UM. His NFL career will look much better than his college
Not saying he's better (he's not) and not trying to be a **** (even though everyone knows I am), but Kaaya did have better stats than Dorsey in 2001. More yards (by 900, though you have to take into account that Dorsey's stats were for 11 games and Kaaya's for 13), more TDs (by 4...13 games to 11), less INT (by 2, in 2 more games), better completion % (62% to 58%).