Watched the Mario Presser

The Mario hire to me is akin to swinging for the fences.
Lane Kiffin to me is akin to a hitter who hits consistently for a high average.
WTF does all that mean?

With Lane and his ability to scheme on offense I believe this year we would have won 8-9 games, and could do so consistently. But without the recruiting chops of Mario, Lane probably tops out at 9 wins, maybe 10 in a stellar year. Always good, never a ’ship.

With Mario, we have no schematic advantage. We win or lose solely with the talent on the field. If he can accumulate great talent we have a chance to win a ‘ship. But with equal, or lesser talent like yesterday, we are sunk.
 
Advertisement
Idk but watching new coaches at Oregon, Florida, tcu, notre dame and lsu put up points I feel there is someone out there that could of gotten more then 98 yards.
who's this person?

And all those players at Oregon are Mario's. So you make my point.
 
Trying to figure out if he legit doesn't give a crap about his job or if this abortion of a season is so far gone that he's just trying to get to the end of it to turnover the roster and coaching staff. He literally seems to be going through the motions right now and that's not something you see a coach doing this early in his tenure.
The dude can’t coach why would he sound optimistic ?
 
who's this person?

And all those players at Oregon are Mario's. So you make my point.
So let me make sure im understanding your argument correctly. Your saying that it's not our current offensive game planning that's the issue, it's the players and there isn't a OC out there that can produce a better offense then we are getting right now?
 
Advertisement
Sonny Dykes went 19-30 at Cal

5-7 1st season at La Tech
5-7 first season at SMU

TrumpyCane wants to know if those fit the narrative?
That's pretty solid I think most people still believe in Mario they just want him to make adjustments like apparently Dykes did. If he doesn't it's going to be pretty toxic this time next year.
 
I actually would take TCU talent over ours right now. QB is a grinder and that got that WR who will likely be a day 1/2 pick. That trumps whatever we have at the moment.
QB is a stud. That WR Davis is explosive as ****, too, great returner. LB corp is stout, as well. When I watch TCU play, I think "wow that's a good football team" not "wow those guys are freak athletes" like Texas or UGA, and I think that comes down to coaching. Hopefully UM can get it right.
 
Tcu has all jrs and srs stsrting except one freshman on the DL

The two deep is basically just as experienced other then a few sophs mixed in…I always mention it but experience goes a long way when you a tick below in talent. Esp when your QB has 29 starts coming into the season. Plus they got rid of Zach Evans who apparently isn’t the best locker room guy going back all the way to his high school days. (Remember UGA let him out of his LOI because of red flags)
 
Advertisement
The Mario hire to me is akin to swinging for the fences.
Lane Kiffin to me is akin to a hitter who hits consistently for a high average.
WTF does all that mean?

With Lane and his ability to scheme on offense I believe this year we would have won 8-9 games, and could do so consistently. But without the recruiting chops of Mario, Lane probably tops out at 9 wins, maybe 10 in a stellar year. Always good, never a ’ship.

With Mario, we have no schematic advantage. We win or lose solely with the talent on the field. If he can accumulate great talent we have a chance to win a ‘ship. But with equal, or lesser talent like yesterday, we are sunk.
NO we can’t win a chip lmao. Saban, Kirby etc can recruit like him and can actually coach
 
So let me make sure im understanding your argument correctly. Your saying that it's not our current offensive game planning that's the issue, it's the players and there isn't a OC out there that can produce a better offense then we are getting right now?
 
Back
Top