Arch probably had 80+ yards passing the last 3 drives of the game so what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. Also OSU won the TOP by 5 minutes. They sat on the ball bc they couldn’t move it.
Exactly. Miami has to be PERFECT. I'd be more understanding if Miami was losing to pure trash, like Texas. Miami lost to a solid Louisville team(who may still end up winning 8-9 games), and a SMU team that may do the exact same thing. Miami is losing close games to quality opponents. That said, because they aren't SEC or B1G teams, none of it matters.
Only one of us lost to FLORIDA.
And only one of us is somehow ranked in the Top 10 again after all that.
Yeah, because Ohio State was playing prevent defense and letting Arch complete the easier, short completions lol
This is what’s most irritating to me and the point of starting this thread. Why our the 2 losses we have considered to bad? Why does the ACC get so much ****? Is it really justified? I think for a good while you might have been able to argue SEC superiority but that was the Saban era and there’s no way in absolute **** an Alabama team coached by Saban gets dominated by 4-5 FSU, or loses to Vandy. Like others have mentioned, there’s more parity in CFB right now compared to 2008-2022ish.
