Canedude08
Sophomore
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2014
- Messages
- 8,284
Fundamental difference between SC and Miami. 1) Even when they are mediocre, they recruit better than we do and 2) Clay Helton, for all his flaws crapped on Manny Diaz as a HC. There also isn't nearly the same amount of adjustment needed, because SC had already become an Air Raid offense under Helton, adding Lincoln Riley didn't mean a fundamental shift in philosophy. I think Lincoln was the perfect hire for SC, because they had the money to overpay for the best coach not named Nick Saban out there. That's what Alabama did when they hired Saban, they saw a high end guy and went all in.After several years of mediocre play, average recruiting and staffs, they look to be turning it around in year 1. Funny how that works with a competent staff. Surprised they aren’t on a 5 year rebuild.
Let's also not pretend that Riley didn't upgrade at key positions, with some huge portal additions. Addison and Williams alone would lead to a better product, that's not including Dye. Riley is a **** good coach, but we also need to pump the brakes. SC should be **** good, especially in the Pac 12, where there's little if any competition. Even at their worst, SC was more talented than everyone in the conference and it wasn't particularly close. I expect SC to win the Pac, maybe make the playoff and the issues that reared their head in Norman for Lincoln to make a return. It's tough to win titles when you don't have any interest in playing defense.