Dwinstitles
All-American
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2011
- Messages
- 53,735
recruiting recruiting recruiting
“I think scheme's overrated,” Meyer said Monday. “… I think it's comical when I hear, ‘It doesn't fit our system.’ Well, change your system.”
We got here and there were no H-backs,” he said. “We had a big tailback and a couple of tight ends and a fullback, and you went 12-0, and we didn't complain about it and didn't say ‘We don't have this and don't have this.’
“So you adapt your schemes. In my opinion, the good coordinators and those type of guys do a very good job with that. You'll find out what you got and do it. And don't (say), ‘Well, he doesn't fit, doesn't fit.’ Make him fit. We'll always take the better player and find a way to make him fit. We did it for years.”
It’s easier to get the top athletes when you’re at Ohio State or Florida, but Meyer said the strategy actually works better at a place like Bowling Green or when he was at Utah in the Mountain West. Find the athletic abilities you can work with and go from there.
“You take your best available athlete you get your hands on and mull it around what you can do with it,” he said. “So I think it's the opposite. I remember the days of BG and at Utah, that kid could run, that kid could play. We'll take him and find out what he can do after that, or find out how you can build around him. Like a real little guy that's as fast as you know what and build around him.”
Urban Meyer: Never sacrifice talent for scheme in recruiting
But what does he know
And that's EXACTLY what Butch Davis did.
Recruited the best athletes, and THEN figure out where they could play best.
recruiting recruiting recruiting
recruiting recruiting recruiting
You think Urban Meyer won a national title with a 3rd string QB because he is a "recruiter" ?
recruiting recruiting recruiting
You think Urban Meyer won a national title with a 3rd string QB because he is a "recruiter" ?
quick question why is that offense not working now since herman left ?
I actually just read a book, written by a military strategist, about this (adaptability in leadership) and it might as well be a review of Golden's tenure. Golden is the classic 'command leader' while the modern [college football] world has become too complex to do anything other than be adaptable and capable of improvisation. There's a military story in the book about a naval battle fought by the British against a much larger and powerful force. I felt like I was reading about Gus Malzahn vs Al Groh.The ability to be flexible and build around that culture is the entire difference in today's more complex (because of information and access) world. It's no different in college football. In fact, it's more pronounced.Great post. The ability to adapt is key to any coach/leader. To this point you have seen Golden come in with his guiding principles and stick to them. They have not worked at UM and he has stuck to his ways. To me this will be his ultimate downfall. We are talented enough to be a double digit win team and compete for the ACC but thie mismatch of scheme and talent so far under Golden do not let us reach our potential. I hope he can prove us wrong. Go Canes
Corch Erving Myas must not know about pillars, core values, ice cream trucks, and hash tags.
Here's what I said about this topic in an article earlier this season:I actually just read a book, written by a military strategist, about this (adaptability in leadership) and it might as well be a review of Golden's tenure. Golden is the classic 'command leader' while the modern [college football] world has become too complex to do anything other than be adaptable and capable of improvisation. There's a military story in the book about a naval battle fought by the British against a much larger and powerful force. I felt like I was reading about Gus Malzahn vs Al Groh.The ability to be flexible and build around that culture is the entire difference in today's more complex (because of information and access) world. It's no different in college football. In fact, it's more pronounced.Great post. The ability to adapt is key to any coach/leader. To this point you have seen Golden come in with his guiding principles and stick to them. They have not worked at UM and he has stuck to his ways. To me this will be his ultimate downfall. We are talented enough to be a double digit win team and compete for the ACC but thie mismatch of scheme and talent so far under Golden do not let us reach our potential. I hope he can prove us wrong. Go Canes
https://www.canesinsight.com/thread/article-standard/89484/3
Here's what I said about this topic in an article earlier this season:I actually just read a book, written by a military strategist, about this (adaptability in leadership) and it might as well be a review of Golden's tenure. Golden is the classic 'command leader' while the modern [college football] world has become too complex to do anything other than be adaptable and capable of improvisation. There's a military story in the book about a naval battle fought by the British against a much larger and powerful force. I felt like I was reading about Gus Malzahn vs Al Groh.The ability to be flexible and build around that culture is the entire difference in today's more complex (because of information and access) world. It's no different in college football. In fact, it's more pronounced.Great post. The ability to adapt is key to any coach/leader. To this point you have seen Golden come in with his guiding principles and stick to them. They have not worked at UM and he has stuck to his ways. To me this will be his ultimate downfall. We are talented enough to be a double digit win team and compete for the ACC but thie mismatch of scheme and talent so far under Golden do not let us reach our potential. I hope he can prove us wrong. Go Canes
https://www.canesinsight.com/thread/article-standard/89484/3
You'll also note that Golden doesn't have any feel for the game. There's zero intuition. He and his coordinators come in with a plan, and once that turns to crap, he's out of ideas.
How many times have we gotten burned several times in the same game with the same play?
Here's what I said about this topic in an article earlier this season:I actually just read a book, written by a military strategist, about this (adaptability in leadership) and it might as well be a review of Golden's tenure. Golden is the classic 'command leader' while the modern [college football] world has become too complex to do anything other than be adaptable and capable of improvisation. There's a military story in the book about a naval battle fought by the British against a much larger and powerful force. I felt like I was reading about Gus Malzahn vs Al Groh.The ability to be flexible and build around that culture is the entire difference in today's more complex (because of information and access) world. It's no different in college football. In fact, it's more pronounced.Great post. The ability to adapt is key to any coach/leader. To this point you have seen Golden come in with his guiding principles and stick to them. They have not worked at UM and he has stuck to his ways. To me this will be his ultimate downfall. We are talented enough to be a double digit win team and compete for the ACC but thie mismatch of scheme and talent so far under Golden do not let us reach our potential. I hope he can prove us wrong. Go Canes
https://www.canesinsight.com/thread/article-standard/89484/3
recruiting recruiting recruiting
You think Urban Meyer won a national title with a 3rd string QB because he is a "recruiter" ?
Corch Erving Myas must not know about pillars, core values, ice cream trucks, and hash tags.