forums

Unc observer reporter

brock said:
“
A Miami athletic department spokesman on Friday didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment about what the university’s reaction is, if any, to its football team’s turnover chain originating from a jeweler whom another ACC school banned from interacting with its athletes.”

From the article, these **** reporters are so **** spiteful of anything miami
Click to expand...

20171117_164203.webp

Only comment the University needs to give.
 
Advertisement
BoroCane83 said:
Most props arent worth thousands of dollars. FFS, Tennessee spent $10 on theirs.

It'll be egg on the NCAA's face though. Banning something as harmless as a prop that gets kids fired up and the fans into it. They'll look even more like curmudgeons about it and a lot of people will be on our sides when they try to ban it.
Click to expand...

Cost less than $10, they bought it at a discount at the dollar store.
 
Schools can get ****ed off all they want, someone name me one NCAA bylaw the turnover chain violates. It's not a gift, it's not any type of monetary value bestowed upon a student athlete, and athletes are allowed to wear necklaces during games. People are just going to have to deal with it because it's here to stay.
 
NCAA better not try to take on the turnover chain, they be in a world of hurt, dont *** with the turnover chain turnover chain turnover chain
 
Most props arent worth thousands of dollars. FFS, Tennessee spent $10 on theirs.

It'll be egg on the NCAA's face though. Banning something as harmless as a prop that gets kids fired up and the fans into it. They'll look even more like curmudgeons about it and a lot of people will be on our sides when they try to ban it.


Lmao @ “curmudgeons” I ain’t heard that word in a minute
 
Last edited:
I see no problem with the article, reporter doing their job and this is newsworthy. I assume we crossed our Ts on vetting this, but nothing would surprise me and I still suspect our compliance dept is not what it should be.
 
Advertisement
3FW said:
I see no problem with the article, reporter doing their job and this is newsworthy. I assume we crossed our Ts on vetting this, but nothing would surprise me and I still suspect our compliance dept is not what it should be.
Click to expand...

Wtf?

How is this newsworthy? Not too mention the last two paragraphs are just a hit piece on Miami.

Then again, it's pretty clear you are butthurt by Miami's success given your post
 
TheRichtShow said:
3FW said:
I see no problem with the article, reporter doing their job and this is newsworthy. I assume we crossed our Ts on vetting this, but nothing would surprise me and I still suspect our compliance dept is not what it should be.
Click to expand...

Wtf?

How is this newsworthy? Not too mention the last two paragraphs are just a hit piece on Miami.

Then again, it's pretty clear you are butthurt by Miami's success given your post
Click to expand...

Grow up you sniveling ****. I went to Miami and bleed orange and green. Do not need to list my bonafides as a Canes fan. Turnover chain is on the front page. There will be scrutiny, you can guarantee that. It's bigger than the Christmas tree this year.
 
3FW said:
I see no problem with the article, reporter doing their job and this is newsworthy. I assume we crossed our Ts on vetting this, but nothing would surprise me and I still suspect our compliance dept is not what it should be.
Click to expand...

You suspect our compliance dept is not what it should be based on what? What facts or first or second observations do you have to justify this statement. Or is it just your female intuition, as most people that read this would surmise.

Does your ***** get a little twinge and that’s how you determine our compliance isn’t doing their job?
 
How much many millions did they pay in legal fee's to fight the massive academic fraud that was taking place there?
 
By the way, this UNC reporter is a cūnt has a hardon for Miami and the turnover chain. Look at this tweet from a week ago. He actually had the balls to ask this question

[TWEET]929537012343984129[/TWEET]
 
Advertisement
Cant ban the turnover chain without banning every other prop in college football... lol we got every school in the country mind fckd over the turnover chain :grinch:
 
I wonder why AJ Machado was band from talking to UNC athletes.

Did he try to force them to attend classes?
 
3FW said:
TheRichtShow said:
3FW said:
I see no problem with the article, reporter doing their job and this is newsworthy. I assume we crossed our Ts on vetting this, but nothing would surprise me and I still suspect our compliance dept is not what it should be.
Click to expand...

Wtf?

How is this newsworthy? Not too mention the last two paragraphs are just a hit piece on Miami.

Then again, it's pretty clear you are butthurt by Miami's success given your post
Click to expand...

Grow up you sniveling ****. I went to Miami and bleed orange and green. Do not need to list my bonafides as a Canes fan. Turnover chain is on the front page. There will be scrutiny, you can guarantee that. It's bigger than the Christmas tree this year.
Click to expand...

I went to UM too, what's your point. You're defending this pathetic UNC reporter and bashing our compliance department.

So go fvck yourself.

We didn't do anything wrong, and you're a huge bvtch if you defend the ****suckers who want to ban it
 
Back
Top