forums

UM vs. UAB @8pm on ACC Network

Advertisement
YouTube TV = Problem Solved for those of you who haven’t cut the chord yet.
 
duke4heisman said:
The problem with streaming, aside from the rising prices, is that you still have to have a fast internet service. By the time you pay for both, it's better to have a bundle with the same service.
Click to expand...
Streaming is still far more user friendly. Just not dealing with actual cable in the house alone is an upgrade. Having access on my phone, computer, etc., or on the road is amazing for me. Plus, better picture and with YouTubetv, unlimited DVR is a no brainer. I’m lucky, I have Fiber with AT&T and am only paying $50 for internet. Comcast can’t compete with that.
 
DomWorld_Peace said:
NBA ratings sucks. If re-runs of SVU are beating it, I promise you a football game can.
Click to expand...

I always watch Canes. But as for other sports, I watch them for an "escape" from dealing with crapp. This year, the NBA does not help me "escape". I'm sure that could be a partial cause of some potentially lower ratings.

Don't know if I'll be able to attend in person, but I know I will DEFINITELY do what it takes to get a worthy stream if I'm not in H.R.

****, I really didn't think games would happen--;SO HAPPY!!
 
Advertisement
Hurracanes said:
Streaming is still far more user friendly. Just not dealing with actual cable in the house alone is an upgrade. Having access on my phone, computer, etc., or on the road is amazing for me. Plus, better picture and with YouTubetv, unlimited DVR is a no brainer. I’m lucky, I have Fiber with AT&T and am only paying $50 for internet. Comcast can’t compete with that.
Click to expand...
The boxes don't bother me, especially since all but the main one can fit behind the TV, sits on the wall mount. I can use xfinity stream from anywhere, on any device. I know Dish and DTV have that also, not sure about the smaller cable companies. The DVR space is plenty for my wife and I but I can understand with your internet situation. I have a brand new house and they didn't put fiber, I pay more than $50 just for the 200 mbps internet.
 
So, I just want to be clear on this. ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPN3, ESPNews, and FoxSportsN all have better sports options? Plus local broadcast stations are swamped with content? Am I getting this right?
 
Advertisement
My question for ppl who have cut the cord. What are good affordable internet services out there? Like someone mentioned, once you factor in youtube TV and a internet provider, it adds up to a bundle with comcast, AT&T, etc.
 
https://sportz.vodiptv.org/home/index

Can check that out.... 6,000+ channels for $9 a month. Have heard many people enjoy the service. They have a web player login for anyone not tech savvy enough to load it onto a streaming device like 4k firestick or nvidia shield, etc. Cannot vouch for the legality of it....think it's a grey area....just throwing it out there for informational purposes.
 
HTXCane said:
It’s $80 a month to get the option that includes the ACCN. I dropped Youtubetv because they jacked the rate up to $70 a month. Will just go back to them if I need to.
Click to expand...
NO. Check it again. Under the family package it's 64.99 and includes ACCN. along with ESPN/SEC/BIg Ten THe $80 per month you are referring is the Ultra package which includes the PAC12 ( no need this year) LOL
 
Back
Top