Rellyrell
Rellywood of mWo
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
- Messages
- 34,626
Give me Lemons over Felix any day. Felix is good, but he doesn't wow me; not a program changer.
How many running backs are really program changers?
Cook was/is a program changer; I think we can agree on that. I can tell you that Gurley, Peterson, McGahee, Johnson, Bush...game changers. There's plenty of backs that have or are currently playing in college that are game changers. Cats that can blow the top off when folks have angles on them; cats that cut back "seamlessly" without losing speed; cats that show out at the Nike camps...those are game changers, and right now, McFarland is that dude imo.
Felix top end speed against inferior competition is not what's up. You put him against better competition and I see a 3 star kid; not bad....just not great or elite. I've compared Lemons tape w Felix's tape and I'm just not enthralled by Felix. I like, REALLY like McFarland and Lemon's tapes.
So you'd put Lemons on the same scale as Cook or McGahee or Gurley? I'm just asking, because that's the rubric you alluded to for Felix.
Lemons is probably a better prospect than Felix but realistically I doubt either of them is a "program changer".
Here's the difference:
Pulling an "A" prospect from a rival school who are the defending ACC Coastal Champions speaks volumes. So here's the two edge sword; not only is Lemons a better prospect, we were able to flip him from a rival school...program changer from a recruiting stand point. Lemons, by himself, is not a program changer from his RB ability alone...but he's a better prospect and these are the recruiting battles we need to continue to win to change the perception of the program. Lemons reminds me of Giovani Bernard...he's not a program changer like Cook, per say, but you definitely wouldn't want to play against him for 3 years