Let’s compare the claim:
UF 2006 - 2009:
48-7 (.873)
2 Nat’l Titles
3 NY6 Bowl Victories
2 SEC Championships
1 Florida Cup
23 total draft picks (7 First-rounders)
5 Pro Bowlers
4 SB Champions
UM 2000 - 2003:
46-4 (.920)
1 Nat’l Title*
3 NY6 Bowl Victories*
4 Big East Championships
2 Florida Cups
35 total draft picks (19 First-rounders)
13 Pro Bowlers
6 SB Champions
*BCS screwed Miami out of Nat’l Title Bid in 2000 (NY Times recognize The Canes as Nat’l Champions)
*Terry Porter Screwed Miami out of Nat’l Title
Even if I wasn’t a die hard Cane fan, as a fan of college football, that 4 yr stretch of greatness from Miami is undeniable. UF from 2006-09 had a great run, I won’t hate on them. Also, they did have a slight higher margin of victory than us during this period at 26.4 vs. our 25.8. Fact is, our QB play fell precipitously off in the 2003 which plummeted our margin of victory. Other than that, we had one undefeated season, two one-loss seasons (should’ve been two undefeated seasons), & didn’t lose no more than 2 games in a season during that four year stretch.
Now, if imma be completely 100, as far as a dominant 4 yr stretch:
The 94-97 Huskers have an argument. They only lost two games during that stretch, & won 3 titles. The 87-90 Canes would have that same dominance if not for a bull chit call in South Bend. And once again, if u consider who we produced during that time period to the NFL vs. Nebraska, again it’s not even up for debate.