cway313
No more excuses
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 30,219
5'8 170lbs doesn't have a role in this offense.10.48 !
whats the knock on this kid??
5'8 170lbs doesn't have a role in this offense.10.48 !
whats the knock on this kid??
Pringle was roughly the same size and speed.5'8 170lbs doesn't have a role in this offense.
Was thinking this exactly (or ncst, gt, smu, etc).This will be another hometown kid we don’t recruit then goes go Louisville and tears it up
No, he is 2-3 inches shorter and 20-30 lbs lighter. That isn't relatively close. The run scheme is not built off of Pringle's strengths which would be my entire point. Slamming a 5'8 RB into the A gap isn't what we need.Pringle was roughly the same size and speed.
Worst case scenario we could definitely use that speed on special teamsNo, he is 2-3 inches shorter and 20-30 lbs lighter. That isn't relatively close. The run scheme is not built off of Pringle's strengths which would be my entire point. Slamming a 5'8 RB into the A gap isn't what we need.
That kid is way faster than Pringle with pads on. Every elite Miami team had guys like him on the roster. Total weapon and we have an OC smart enough to scheme him in.Pringle was roughly the same size and speed.
I'm a big fan of recruiting speed.Worst case scenario we could definitely use that speed on special teams
No, he is 2-3 inches shorter and 20-30 lbs lighter. That isn't relatively close. The run scheme is not built off of Pringle's strengths which would be my entire point. Slamming a 5'8 RB into the A gap isn't what we need.