Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
Paying for these kids' lawyer sounds like an impermissible benefit to me..
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
One reason is already listed by others above.
Reason number two is like most people who've drank to whatever degree, tend to think they're just fine to drive. So he took it, thought he'd pass, and the rest is history.
I added point number three after you posted I guess.
Bottom line, if you're drunk and pulled over, most states have closed any loopholes that previously existed.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
One reason is already listed by others above.
Reason number two is like most people who've drank to whatever degree, tend to think they're just fine to drive. So he took it, thought he'd pass, and the rest is history.
I'm not a lawyiar but mine told me to never blow or give urine/blood unless faced with a judges signature.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
One reason is already listed by others above.
Reason number two is like most people who've drank to whatever degree, tend to think they're just fine to drive. So he took it, thought he'd pass, and the rest is history.
Reason number three, if they suspect you're under the influence of something, refusing to take the test doesn't matter. They'll just slap your butt in the back of a police car, take you to the station, and draw blood. If you're just over at that point, you could make a case that you weren't at the time you were pulled over, but refusal isn't some get out of trouble magic word.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
One reason is already listed by others above.
Reason number two is like most people who've drank to whatever degree, tend to think they're just fine to drive. So he took it, thought he'd pass, and the rest is history.
Reason number three, if they suspect you're under the influence of something, refusing to take the test doesn't matter. They'll just slap your butt in the back of a police car, take you to the station, and draw blood. If you're just over at that point, you could make a case that you weren't at the time you were pulled over, but refusal isn't some get out of trouble magic word.
I don't keep up with this sort of stuff any longer, but wasn't there a case out of Missouri that clamped down on blood test without a warrant? It is scary that they can do that even with a warrant. A destruction of yet another personal right once viewed as untouchable. We are so far down the road to a fascist/communist state that virtually nothing of what was or form of government is recognizable today. Before all the Democrats and Republicans get up in arms, this is something is a product of both parties for many years. Every bad problem has been an excuse to make the central government more powerful since the beginning.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
One reason is already listed by others above.
Reason number two is like most people who've drank to whatever degree, tend to think they're just fine to drive. So he took it, thought he'd pass, and the rest is history.
Reason number three, if they suspect you're under the influence of something, refusing to take the test doesn't matter. They'll just slap your butt in the back of a police car, take you to the station, and draw blood. If you're just over at that point, you could make a case that you weren't at the time you were pulled over, but refusal isn't some get out of trouble magic word.
I don't keep up with this sort of stuff any longer, but wasn't there a case out of Missouri that clamped down on blood test without a warrant? It is scary that they can do that even with a warrant. A destruction of yet another personal right once viewed as untouchable. We are so far down the road to a fascist/communist state that virtually nothing of what was or form of government is recognizable today. Before all the Democrats and Republicans get up in arms, this is something is a product of both parties for many years. Every bad problem has been an excuse to make the central government more powerful since the beginning.
They have to get electronic warrants for non consent tests.
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
One reason is already listed by others above.
Reason number two is like most people who've drank to whatever degree, tend to think they're just fine to drive. So he took it, thought he'd pass, and the rest is history.
Reason number three, if they suspect you're under the influence of something, refusing to take the test doesn't matter. They'll just slap your butt in the back of a police car, take you to the station, and draw blood. If you're just over at that point, you could make a case that you weren't at the time you were pulled over, but refusal isn't some get out of trouble magic word.
I don't keep up with this sort of stuff any longer, but wasn't there a case out of Missouri that clamped down on blood test without a warrant? It is scary that they can do that even with a warrant. A destruction of yet another personal right once viewed as untouchable. We are so far down the road to a fascist/communist state that virtually nothing of what was or form of government is recognizable today. Before all the Democrats and Republicans get up in arms, this is something is a product of both parties for many years. Every bad problem has been an excuse to make the central government more powerful since the beginning.
They have to get electronic warrants for non consent tests.
That still requires consent from a judge right?
Why don't college's have lawyers to counsel these guys on what to do if they are pulled over?
Why the **** would top college football player take a breathalyzer? Just refuse it and lose your license for a while. BFD.
That DUI stays with you for life.
Paying for these kids' lawyer sounds like an impermissible benefit to me..
Why can't it be free from the law school or something? A required class for all athletes. There is always a way.