- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Messages
- 8,081
Goofy, look through this thread. I’ve been a fan of Keys the whole time while other guys thought Kimble or Robinson or whoever else was better.Didn’t want MJC anyways this guy was my #1 always!!!!
I see it as both. He is a consolation prize because MJC is that good. Now all that said, Keys is a stud.Meh, **** Dennis. And as noted by my comments in this thread, I’ve always seen Keys as a stud and not a consolation prize.
My post is just tongue in cheek lol I like Keys as well.Goofy, look through this thread. I’ve been a fan of Keys the whole time while other guys thought Kimble or Robinson or whoever else was better.
He’s not a consolation prize although MJC was obviously the bigger talent.
We positioned ourselves to get both as we rightfully should have. The past two cycles we’ve positioned ourselves to get two legit RBs and have failed twice in a row. We may get two RBs this cycle but the second one (if it’s Lacey for example) likely wont be on the same talent plane as Keys and MJC.I see it as both. He is a consolation prize because MJC is that good. Now all that said, Keys is a stud.
Which will bring a transfer rb into the picture. 1 last cycle with Marty, none this cycle, more than likely 1 next cycle. I’m ok with that.We positioned ourselves to get both as we rightfully should have. The past two cycles we’ve positioned ourselves to get two legit RBs and have failed twice in a row. We may get two RBs this cycle but the second one (if it’s Lacey for example) likely wont be on the same talent plane as Keys and MJC.I see it as both. He is a consolation prize because MJC is that good. Now all that said, Keys is a stud.
I think it’s a little different this cycle because we didn’t have the 4 unique backs — Lyle, Mallory, Pringle, and Marty — the previous cycle when Martinez was graduating.Which will bring a transfer rb into the picture. 1 last cycle with Marty, none this cycle, more than likely 1 next cycle. I’m ok with that.
Why do people type this ****?
Cause it’s accurate
With the current way of doing things, I’d expect someone to always transfer. This year seemed like an outlier. Think we were all shocked no one left.I think it’s a little different this cycle because we didn’t have the 4 unique backs — Lyle, Mallory, Pringle, and Marty — the previous cycle when Martinez was graduating.Which will bring a transfer rb into the picture. 1 last cycle with Marty, none this cycle, more than likely 1 next cycle. I’m ok with that.
We really only had Lyle and Fletcher; with Pringle being an incoming freshman and CWH not having enough opportunity for us to know. Ajay Allen was leaving as well.
We really shouldn’t need a transfer unless somebody transfers.
Even if someone transfers, i doubt we carry 7 RBs next year; which we would if we bring in two freshmen and a transfer. We’ll see if we get two rbs or not.With the current way of doing things, I’d expect someone to always transfer. This year seemed like an outlier. Think we were all shocked no one left.
. We needed to load up here imo