Trey Zuhn = 🫏

[creamofthecrop13]

i think it's really weak and soft they didn't have to do post game press conferences

 

[Ghandi]

Bain did not have a sack against Zuhn.

He will be a great pro.

Glad you’re representing him, but I’d caution about how you publicly phrase support for this dude.

He was whooped the entire game by Mesidor, Bain, Lightfoot and anyone that lined up on him.

If you have video showing something different I’d love to see it.

 

[Ispyin]

Glad you’re representing him, but I’d caution about how you publicly phrase support for this dude.

He was whooped the entire game by Mesidor, Bain, Lightfoot and anyone that lined up on him.

If you have video showing something different I’d love to see it.

It doesn’t exist. Weird hill to die on for post game Pete

 

[CityboyCanes4life82]

*** clown, I said I loved our DLine over the summer.

I also picked us to go 11-1. There is no crow to eat

YOU, the *** clown who says I don't know **** who continues giving me clicks, said we had multiple DL over 310 pounds - I said we don't, and we don't. I was right and you were wrong.

They done brought out Pistol Pete!

 

[BS85]

View attachment 347920

I thought Danny Boy Cane didn't go to the game?

 

[pyhooya]

They done brought out Pistol Pete!

Funny how the Maude didnt punish Pete but went after the response....................

 

[AtlAtty]

Funny how the Maude didnt punish Pete but went after the response....................

They are both wrong, but Pete didn’t initiate this argument. Sometimes that is a factor.

 

[pyhooya]

They are both wrong, but Pete didn’t initiate this argument. Sometimes that is a factor.

you didnt ban Pete cause.......
So as long as you dont initiate that gives the person the right to say whatever with no repercussions? Thanks for the info

 

[AtlAtty]

you didnt ban Pete cause.......
So as long as you dont initiate that gives the person the right to say whatever with no repercussions? Thanks for the info

Of course not, but the initiator logically has more responsibility for the argument. In court we call that the “But for” test. For example, but for NicKane bringing Pete into the discussion, is Pete even in the discussion? Obviously not.

Did Pete respond poorly after being attacked? Obviously. But Pete didn’t pick the fight, and that matters.

Anyway, if this is too complicated for you to grasp, then so be it.