Da Jumbo Mutombo
Senior
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
- Messages
- 4,812
Getting past the obvious that he really sucked this year but was easily one of the best pitchers in the country as a sophomore…
What’s his pitch mix look like? He throwing mid 90s at least?
Getting past the obvious that he really sucked this year but was easily one of the best pitchers in the country as a sophomore…
What’s his pitch mix look like? He throwing mid 90s at least?
What is delusional? He flipped in 2022; Tennessee is coming off hosting its first regional. Instead of typing, actually go out on the street and talk to people in the game..... That goes for all of you
I was looking into that earlier too. His HR rate went through the roof and I wonder if he became too fastball dependent. If you speed up bats then you get a higher contact rate.Morningstar with a 3.42, 3.18, 3.49 SIERA each of the last three years.
He's been nearly the same guy each year, but variance on Balls in Play have really hurt him. He tends to give up a lot of pulled fly balls and those go for HR's often. His HR/FB% was absurd two of the three years and you'd expect that to regress, but the batted ball profile will always lend itself to HR's being an issue.
He also gives up too many line drives (line drives go for hits more than any batted ball type).
This is the type of pitcher who has a bit of a batted ball profile issue and will be at the mercy of a variance a bit. If you get expected regression in contact outcomes, you've got a good weekend starter. If he gets continued hard contact and pulled fly balls, it will sink the overall package.
Big talent. Big tools and great stuff. This is a guy you take all day and find a role for.
Morningstar and Mendez are two major arms that need development in different ways but can change the ceiling of the program in a significant way.
How are you able to calculate Morningstar's SIERA? The formula requires you know how many ground balls, fly balls and pop-ups the pitcher allows and this information is not on the Wake Forest stat sheet.Morningstar with a 3.42, 3.18, 3.49 SIERA each of the last three years.
He's been nearly the same guy each year, but variance on Balls in Play have really hurt him. He tends to give up a lot of pulled fly balls and those go for HR's often. His HR/FB% was absurd two of the three years and you'd expect that to regress, but the batted ball profile will always lend itself to HR's being an issue.
He also gives up too many line drives (line drives go for hits more than any batted ball type).
This is the type of pitcher who has a bit of a batted ball profile issue and will be at the mercy of a variance a bit. If you get expected regression in contact outcomes, you've got a good weekend starter. If he gets continued hard contact and pulled fly balls, it will sink the overall package.
Big talent. Big tools and great stuff. This is a guy you take all day and find a role for.
Morningstar and Mendez are two major arms that need development in different ways but can change the ceiling of the program in a significant way.
It comes from Syneegy data. You can get on D1Baseball.comHow are you able to calculate Morningstar's SIERA? The formula requires you know how many ground balls, fly balls and pop-ups the pitcher allows and this information is not on the Wake Forest stat sheet.
Wake Forest is a Cracker Jack box stadium. Bad place to play most of your games there if that’s your M.O.Morningstar with a 3.42, 3.18, 3.49 SIERA each of the last three years.
He's been nearly the same guy each year, but variance on Balls in Play have really hurt him. He tends to give up a lot of pulled fly balls and those go for HR's often. His HR/FB% was absurd two of the three years and you'd expect that to regress, but the batted ball profile will always lend itself to HR's being an issue.
He also gives up too many line drives (line drives go for hits more than any batted ball type).
This is the type of pitcher who has a bit of a batted ball profile issue and will be at the mercy of a variance a bit. If you get expected regression in contact outcomes, you've got a good weekend starter. If he gets continued hard contact and pulled fly balls, it will sink the overall package.
Big talent. Big tools and great stuff. This is a guy you take all day and find a role for.
Morningstar and Mendez are two major arms that need development in different ways but can change the ceiling of the program in a significant way.
Their cooperstown dreams like park is an embarrassment to collegiate baseballA "launching pad". I've been there it's a pitchers nightmare.
Yeah his ERA wasn't good and he was definitely a pitch to contact guy. 0nly gave up 1 home run in 41 innings. 22 of 25 appearances were out of the bullpen. .239 BAA.It seems like we are building the bullpen essentially the same way we did last year's.
It seems like we are building the bullpen essentially the same way we did last year's.
Most of the hits it looks like came when he was a starter. He was decent albight far from elite out of the bullpen. Although even if he had great numbers he pitched in the Big Ten which is terrible.145 career IP, 166 hits, 90ks.
![]()
Year 3 was better than his first 2 but still is pretty mid. Guess when you need bodies this is what happensMost of the hits it looks like came when he was a starter. He was decent albight far from elite out of the bullpen. Although even if he had great numbers he pitched in the Big Ten which is terrible.
Stats are not impressive in any way.See...now thats a garbage pickup. That doesnt move the needle one bit.