- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Messages
- 3,845
Look againLooked pretty close to me
Look againLooked pretty close to me
Unfortunately close only matters in certain situations.It was closer than I originally thought
you're right.. but the poster stated that it was "obvious " which is wasn't . great play call and I'm sure we will see it again.. Glad it went they way it did.. learning process with no harm.Unfortunately close only matters in certain situations.
Seems like the play call stood, so yea it was obviousyou're right.. but the poster stated that it was "obvious " which is wasn't . great play call and I'm sure we will see it again.. Glad it went they way it did.. learning process with no harm.
It makes it better that it was probably a forward pass. I want them to think about that **** every day for a year the way we had to think about blocked XPs and tipped passes being caught for Tds
Or the horse collar tackle of DJ that wasn't calledOh well is right. What about that Frenchy fumble that was over-turned. What a bunch of cry-baby b!tches man. F*ck that whole corny-*** program. F*cking media-darling hoe-*** dirty mofos.
Since there are no perfect parallel passes, it actually has to be backwards, even if it's 1/100th of an inch, and it looks parallel. There will never be a way to prove a pass was perfectly parallel, and that is why you make darn sure you throw the ball backwards. Frenchie didn't do a good enough job of this.A lateral doesn't have to be backwards. It can be parallel.
lol. Obvious forward pass. Their punter should be kicked out of their university. That was not a football play.
there was nothing obvious about that call. it was **** close............ learn how to draw a line
Horseshoes and hand grenades.Unfortunately close only matters in certain situations.
Aint gonna lie they set it up beautifully.
x100Phucc em! They didn’t have a problem when Walton’s TD was called back on some bullsh1t. My response is, “oh well!”