I mean Lake has been at practice, so I value his opinion more than say....yours. And if we are indicting Emory and Judd while also saying that Nickel is clearly behind both of them, doesn't that mean we should, by definition, dial back some of the praise?
I didn't call the kid a scab, just felt like speculating that maybe hyping a non-elite high school quarterback was a bit premature.
Stop digging a deeper grave for yourself.
Lake has been at which practices, exactly? The 7 in shells? Whoopty-*******-doo.
And if we are indicting Emory and Judd, it will be based on two prior years of experience and play (Emory) or one prior year of experience and play (Judd). Not just ONE practice in pads.
Nobody has said "Nickel is clearly behind both of them". But that's where true freshmen start out. When he's had, say, more than ONE practice in pads to move ahead of Emory and Judd, then he can do so. But not based on "hype" or "star ratings". I'd prefer for Nickel to beat out Emory and Judd based on performance.
ONE PRACTICE in pads. Oh, but we should take what David Lake says as Gospel.
Get the **** out of here.
And I'm not sure why YOU have deemed him to be a "non-elite high school quarterback". Nickel was named Mr. Georgia Football. And as for the nonsense about him being a 3-star, he is a:
4-star on on3 (#100 overall, #11 QB)
4-star on 247 (#247 overall, #16 QB)
4-star on ESPN (#299 overall, #17 QB)
4-star on Rivals (#16 QB)
Consensus/composite 4-star (#230 overall, #19 QB)