forums

Third and Goal

TheU1984

TheU1984

All American
Joined
Nov 3, 2011
Messages
10,200
Was I a dreaming? Did I drink too much? Did we basically run a handoff to our TE to the short side of the field on a third and goal? The ‘85 Bears got away with something similar because they were up about 40. But that could’ve been the difference. What the ***.
 
Advertisement
TheU1984 said:
Was I a dreaming? Did I drink too much? Did we basically run a handoff to our TE to the short side of the field on a third and goal? The ‘85 Bears got away with something similar because they were up about 40. But that could’ve been the difference. What the ***.
Click to expand...

We complain about being too predictable, you see a play you never thought you would see, and you complain.
 
It was a horrible call. The biggest problem I have with it was the decision to run outside when we were getting stuffed all night. As soon as we started going up the middle we had success.
 
PanamaCityCanes said:
We complain about being too predictable, you see a play you never thought you would see, and you complain.
Click to expand...

We are anything but predictable in the red zone. Nothing we do down there makes any sense If we would’ve ran it up the middle 4 times, inside the 5 against VT we don’t lose that game. If we would’ve done it against UVA on that serious we don’t have to sweat out an 8 point lead at the end.
 
On the series before, the play where we motioned all three tight ends and threw the fade to Osborn was awesome. It’s incredible how creative we can look on one play and then so archaic the next.
 
Advertisement
Definitely unpredictable. If Mallory holds the block, maybe Brevin cuts up field and scores... That's a play that you run twice for scores against soft teams like Bethune cookman, then run a wrinkle with the same look against a real team.
 
Unpredictability doesn’t make a play good. For example, I never thought I would see a half back pass in the snow.
 
Back
Top