MEGA There’s Still Hope for the ACCCG/CFB Playoffs Mega Merge Thread

Advertisement
They’re at -2200. I could be wrong, but I recall last seeing them at -1600 yesterday.
Interesting

Screenshot 2025-12-04 194439.png


Extra free money then on Kalshi on Bama now
 
Advertisement
+360 on FD
BYU is +410

@OrangeBowlMagic

“This is my last time looking”

“Until the first thing in the morning to definitely not check if it moved overnight”

I’ve been watching our natty odds on DK. I don’t put quite as much stock into this one because it’s such a liability so I think a lot less money will move it but we were 150/1 yesterday. It went to 125/1 earlier today and it’s now 100/1. It’s still a great bet to throw $20 or $50 just because we’re definitely live to make the playoffs and if we do, that number will be at absolute worst 15/1 on Sunday morning. Maybe even 12/1.
 
“Until the first thing in the morning to definitely not check if it moved overnight”

I’ve been watching our natty odds on DK. I don’t put quite as much stock into this one because it’s such a liability so I think a lot less money will move it but we were 150/1 yesterday. It went to 125/1 earlier today and it’s now 100/1. It’s still a great bet to throw $20 or $50 just because we’re definitely live to make the playoffs and if we do, that number will be at absolute worst 15/1 on Sunday morning. Maybe even 12/1.
just last night made a thread about it being +15000 to win the title, now it's +10000

I'm going to lay down some just in case and then hedge a byu win I guess
 
Everyone in the Top 25 that is left out, should do this. Watch how fast the playoff is expanded.
The playoff will most likely be expanded to 16 next year. The SEC and B1G are in charge of the format “in consultation” with the other conferences (spoiler: Phillips is not constructively participating). They both agree on expanding the field.

However, B1G is in favor of a 4+4+2+2 autobid with 4 at-large. The SEC is in favor of the current 5 autobids and 11 at-large. SEC also wants to introduce some mandatory objective criteria. On the surface, that idea seems good, but there are a lot of metrics that are inherently biased towards the big 2 and no surprise those are the ones they want to use.

I think this eventually goes to 1-2 super conferences with divisions and NFL-type criteria for playoff qualification and the G5 being basically separate. That will force ND to join a conference. I also personally like a promotion and relegation system but doubt that will ever happen.
 
It's interesting that most people here think that the reason Bama bumped Notre Dame for the 9 spot is to be able to swap spots again if Bama loses the SEC championship game, so Notre Dame gets the 9 again and Bama gets the 10. Since there is a one spot buffer, committee will say it doesn't have to use Head to Head of Miami/ND. Joel Klatt had a different theory- he thinks the reason the Notre Dame got moved to 10 is just in case Duke wins the ACC championship. We all know if Duke wins ACC gets no rep in the playoffs. So he thinks the committee is setting up the scenario to move Miami down to 11 if BYU loses and Duke wins, setting up the Head to Head comparison, and getting Miami into the playoffs as the ACC rep. It's a theory, anyways.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top