View attachment 343030
This is what we need next week (according to the generator), and we control our own destiny for the ACC championship. Technically, we don't need NCST to beat FSU, but I threw that in there for me.
vandy isnt a worryI think the most realistic help here is:
Cincy to beat BYU
Mizzou to beat OK
TN to beat Vandy
possibly auburn beating bama
Why is Stanford over Cal and UNC over Duke relevant?
Why is Stanford over Cal and UNC over Duke relevant?
The OP seems very intelligent. He makes a lot of great points. But here’s my moronic take, if we finish 10-2, we should get in. I don’t care about how the dominoes fall. 2 close losses and one heavily influenced by bad zebras.
The ONLY possibility I would guess at is whether you got down to one of the tiebreakers that analyzed the records of all your opponents?
BYU needs to go away
Just so demoralizing we are in the position yet again. No one in the ACC has a roster even close to as talented as ours. We are going to be the highest ranked team in the conference and may not even be in the ACC CG.
The ONLY possibility I would guess at is whether you got down to one of the tiebreakers that analyzed the records of all your opponents?
End of the day I’m not worried about byu. Texas tech should bury them in the big 12 CG and, despite the “rule” that they won’t ding you for a CG loss, byu doesn’t draw enough eyeballs. No one wants them in. So they won’t be.Root for TCU to have the kind of second half that aTm had today...
Wouldnt SMU would still have to lose to Cal and/or UVA would still have to lose to VT in the final week. I believe SMU gets in over us in the 2 loss scenario.View attachment 343030
This is what we need next week (according to the generator), and we control our own destiny for the ACC championship. Technically, we don't need NCST to beat FSU, but I threw that in there for me.
Sorry I didn’t get to finish my post because this site is weird and randomly refreshes. I don’t consider any of our losses “bad losses” at all. Louisville and SMU likely finish the season with 8-9 wins. It’s unrealistic to expect us to steamroll everyone every week. I mean, Vandy doesn’t. Oklahoma doesn’t. Ole Miss doesn’t. You get my point.I choose not to trust the refs, and I choose not to trust the CFP Committee, particularly with the legal issues facing the (former?) chairman.
If we want definitive "Miami is in" conclusions, those are the games we focus on.
Maybe it will all work out without those games falling our way. That may be true. But I prefer certainty.
Wouldnt SMU would still have to lose to Cal and/or UVA would still have to lose to VT in the final week
Interesting. And in a 6 team 6-2 tiebreaker, we would get duke in Charlotte. Unofficially of course bc of that ratings formula.That is what I thought, but UVA would be the #1 seed, and SMU would lose the tiebreaker to us due to our conference opponent's win percentage. Head-to-head goes out the window with a three/four-time tie, so SMU beating us won't automatically place them ahead.
Again, I am using this -----> https://bball.notnothing.net/acc.php?sport=fb ...as a reference
Interesting. And in a 6 team 6-2 tiebreaker, we would get duke in Charlotte. Unofficially of course bc of that ratings formula.
Best case scenario IMOAssuming the formula is correct, and I think it is, then yes, which would be insane.