The Savvy Investment Behind Washington’s College Football Title Run

Walsh5

Recruit
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Messages
204
Wall Street Journal Article I thought was a good read.

Basically, don't overpay for head coach and overpay your best assistants.

Select quotes below.

https://www.wsj.com/sports/football...rubb-coach-salary-43cdffd5?mod=hp_featst_pos3

When Saban came calling following the Huskies’ 11-2 season in 2022, Washington hiked Grubb’s salary to $2 million, making him one of the highest-paid assistant coaches in the country. What’s highly unusual about that is how little Washington head coach Kalen DeBoer makes by comparison: $4.2 million.

That means that Grubb makes nearly 50% of DeBoer’s salary—a higher percentage of his head coach’s pay than any other assistant in college football. By contrast, Michigan’s offensive coordinator is paid $1.15 million, or just 14% of Jim Harbaugh’s $8.3 million salary.

--

Collectively, no school in a major conference spends a higher share of its coaching budget on assistant coaches than Washington.

The fact that DeBoer entrusts so much to his assistants, and that they’re well compensated, is directly linked to Washington’s success, said Alisa Cohn, a New York-based executive coach.

She said there are lessons for leaders beyond the football field in the way he has invested in his staff. “The way to attract great talent is to give them opportunities to take on high-stakes, high-profile roles and run with it,” Cohn said. “And you have to be able to loosen the reins to do that.”

--

Washington has lower football revenue than Michigan ($91 million to $131 million). It also has fewer blue-chip recruits. In fact, the Huskies have a grand total of zero five-star players.

That means the people charged with developing and directing those players have become even more important.
 
Advertisement
Wall Street Journal Article I thought was a good read.

Basically, don't overpay for head coach and overpay your best assistants.

Select quotes below.

https://www.wsj.com/sports/football...rubb-coach-salary-43cdffd5?mod=hp_featst_pos3

When Saban came calling following the Huskies’ 11-2 season in 2022, Washington hiked Grubb’s salary to $2 million, making him one of the highest-paid assistant coaches in the country. What’s highly unusual about that is how little Washington head coach Kalen DeBoer makes by comparison: $4.2 million.

That means that Grubb makes nearly 50% of DeBoer’s salary—a higher percentage of his head coach’s pay than any other assistant in college football. By contrast, Michigan’s offensive coordinator is paid $1.15 million, or just 14% of Jim Harbaugh’s $8.3 million salary.

--

Collectively, no school in a major conference spends a higher share of its coaching budget on assistant coaches than Washington.

The fact that DeBoer entrusts so much to his assistants, and that they’re well compensated, is directly linked to Washington’s success, said Alisa Cohn, a New York-based executive coach.

She said there are lessons for leaders beyond the football field in the way he has invested in his staff. “The way to attract great talent is to give them opportunities to take on high-stakes, high-profile roles and run with it,” Cohn said. “And you have to be able to loosen the reins to do that.”

--

Washington has lower football revenue than Michigan ($91 million to $131 million). It also has fewer blue-chip recruits. In fact, the Huskies have a grand total of zero five-star players.

That means the people charged with developing and directing those players have become even more important.
Actually a brilliant strategy.
 
Good idea on overpaying important assistants, the issue is the contract discrepancy with other offer DeBoer is gonna get. Hard to turn down a 2x richer contract offer
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
tenor(1).gif
 
That’s cute and all but it won’t last. DeBoer is about to get a major raise or he’s gonna be coaching somewhere else. Grubb isn’t long for his own HC gig either.

This isn’t the 80s. There are no more innovative ideas changing the game. If one of the big boys doesn’t have it, they just pay for it. It’s why modern day dynasties are impossible to sustain at non blue blood schools.
 
Advertisement
Deboer coached 2 year sat Fresno St before getting the UW job. Of course he wasn't very expensive.
The percentages matter very little compared to the actual total numbers.
This "analysis" is basically just that a highly paid assistants are a good investment lol.

If Saban is making $15M, of course his assistants are earning a lower percentage than like at Washington... yet he still has the same assistant budget lol. So what the **** does the % matter? Sure if you're trying to more efficiently allocate the resources that is a strategy, but it also ignores that Deboer will 100% get a contract extension with a massive pay bump. So then you're either choosing to keep that same method and move on to another inexperienced HC and hoping you hit a home run again, or you pay you HC and drop the % to the assistants (yet the total number can still be the same for them)... Basically this isn't really making a point except that paying for better coaches can lead to better results?
 
Wall Street Journal Article I thought was a good read.

Basically, don't overpay for head coach and overpay your best assistants.

Select quotes below.

https://www.wsj.com/sports/football...rubb-coach-salary-43cdffd5?mod=hp_featst_pos3

When Saban came calling following the Huskies’ 11-2 season in 2022, Washington hiked Grubb’s salary to $2 million, making him one of the highest-paid assistant coaches in the country. What’s highly unusual about that is how little Washington head coach Kalen DeBoer makes by comparison: $4.2 million.

That means that Grubb makes nearly 50% of DeBoer’s salary—a higher percentage of his head coach’s pay than any other assistant in college football. By contrast, Michigan’s offensive coordinator is paid $1.15 million, or just 14% of Jim Harbaugh’s $8.3 million salary.

--

Collectively, no school in a major conference spends a higher share of its coaching budget on assistant coaches than Washington.

The fact that DeBoer entrusts so much to his assistants, and that they’re well compensated, is directly linked to Washington’s success, said Alisa Cohn, a New York-based executive coach.

She said there are lessons for leaders beyond the football field in the way he has invested in his staff. “The way to attract great talent is to give them opportunities to take on high-stakes, high-profile roles and run with it,” Cohn said. “And you have to be able to loosen the reins to do that.”

--

Washington has lower football revenue than Michigan ($91 million to $131 million). It also has fewer blue-chip recruits. In fact, the Huskies have a grand total of zero five-star players.

That means the people charged with developing and directing those players have become even more important.
Outstanding Post....
 
Advertisement
I believe he just recently in the last few years got a bump.
Yes, when Mario signed he was making $750K more than him (same is true for Napier and Norvell btw - they were getting around $7.25m too). But make no mistake we weren't signing Kiffin to the same deal he was already getting from Ole Miss lol... he'd also be getting a pay raise to come here. Also just like QBs in the NFL, the next top one to sign resets the market in their tier.

Idk how many times this has to be said but Mario is like barely a top 15 paid Coach in CFB, and he's signed for 10 years. The difference between Mario and the rest of the top 25 paid coaches is $1.7M (Wittingham makes like $6.3M at Utah, and he's loyal there). That means hes almost twice as close to being paid like that 25th highest guy than the 1st... Anyways, Yall really think THAT is what is gunna stop us from hiring a top assistant?
 
I agree with the premise, and it's what we were doing in the early 90s. However, it is only sustainable VERY BRIEFLY in today's college football, as the HC will inevitably get a raise, assistants will leave for coordinator jobs (barring the rare circumstance that they lack that ambition) and coordinators will move to HC gigs (barring the rare circumstance that they lack that ambition).

Yes, after departures, programs should try their best to hire to emulate the model, but it won't be duplicated every year for a decade. It's not possible.

There are also some misleading uses/interpretation of useful numbers in the article.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement
Back
Top