I want to revisit something about scheme and philosophy, which are two different things but go hand and hand. Our front is designed to create havoc and we cover in Palms/Cover 6. Theoretically, I suppose, Manny wants to cause the qb to panic and make a mistake or dump it off and rally to the football. We keep everything in front of us (in theory), but then we DON’T TACKLE WELL. If your philosophy is to rally and bring the ball carrier to the ground, but you aren’t a great tackling team, then how can you execute your plan? It happens in run support, too. This defense REQUIRES two safeties that can tackle. There is no coincidence why our best defensive years had Rayshawn, JJ, and Redwine in regular rotation. Our safeties clean up so much. So on top of having poor tackling safeties that suck at angles, the other teams know and have adjusted. That’s why we see counters and cutbacks; they are betting that we will flow out of the play in the front seven and their guy will beat our guy one on one. They usually do
Secondly, Manny is an analytics guy. He admitted that App St did not show counters on tape and he wasn’t prepared. This is like the nerd that buys all the test prep for the standardized test and then freaks out and doesn’t do well because the questions aren’t exactly the same. If you’re a baseball fan, you see this all the time with modern managers (see Snell being pulled by Cash). It’s almost paralysis by analysis. To me, this is the scariest part of Manny and why we often times need until half time to adjust
I don’t think this defense is fixable with this scheme and philosophy. The best thing we can do is play better complimentary football and score more or make them drive the length almost every time. This will not be a shut down unit against anyone that doesn’t beat themselves