The new blindside block rule will take the OOOOHS out of college football

OriginalCanesCanesCanes

All-ACC (#1 most reproted porster on CIS)
Premium
Joined
Feb 7, 2013
Messages
36,649
SIAP - I wasn’t even aware of this rule, sorry if I missed it if there was a thread, but this is going to be a nightmare. No more decleaters.

There’s just too much margin of error for a ref.


“Most blindside blocks will be personal fouls.
The N.C.A.A. has come up with a formal definition of a blindside block — “an open field block against an opponent that is initiated from outside the opponent’s field of vision, or otherwise in such a manner that the opponent cannot reasonably defend himself against the block” — and mostly banned the play.

“It’s easy to keep a player from getting to the ball carrier when they are running at those speeds, a shove, a push,” Greg Burks, the Big 12’s coordinator of officials. “But we want to eliminate that de-cleater where we see somebody leveled and they don’t see the play coming at all.”
With certain exceptions, those blocks will be called as personal fouls, which carry a 15-yard penalty.





The ref has to determine if the blocker was in the field of vision of the person being blocked. Ref basically has to make a determination whether he could see or not see the blocker coming.

I don’t see how this doesn’t turn into a another disaster, with some hard blocks getting flagged, purely based on a judgment of whether the person being blocked could see the person coming on .

This game is being legislated to death.
 
Advertisement
SIAP - I wasn’t even aware of this rule, sorry if I missed it if there was a thread, but this is going to be a nightmare. No more decleaters.

There’s just too much margin of error for a ref.


“Most blindside blocks will be personal fouls.
The N.C.A.A. has come up with a formal definition of a blindside block — “an open field block against an opponent that is initiated from outside the opponent’s field of vision, or otherwise in such a manner that the opponent cannot reasonably defend himself against the block” — and mostly banned the play.

“It’s easy to keep a player from getting to the ball carrier when they are running at those speeds, a shove, a push,” Greg Burks, the Big 12’s coordinator of officials. “But we want to eliminate that de-cleater where we see somebody leveled and they don’t see the play coming at all.”
With certain exceptions, those blocks will be called as personal fouls, which carry a 15-yard penalty.





The ref has to determine if the blocker was in the field of vision of the person being blocked. Ref basically has to make a determination whether he could see or not see the blocker coming.

I don’t see how this doesn’t turn into a another disaster, with some hard blocks getting flagged, purely based on a judgment of whether the person being blocked could see the person coming on .

This game is being legislated to death.
Yeah, I get the idea. Lots of people are turning up with brain injuries, and I totally get trying to make the game safer. But at some point you have to either accept what the game is or do away with it. You can't ask a player to tackle another but put so many restrictions on how he does that if you want to maintain the integrity of the sport. At some point you either let the game be violent and accept the consequences of that, or you outlaw the game.

Put it is way: what if a defensive player decides it's worth laying out a star receiver or QB or whoever, what then? What if, as a coach, I just take several penalties in a row to let the other team know I'm head hunting and they should be scared? It's like when an NFL player gets fined $10k and you think "big deal, that's nothing to him".

We're approaching the point where that determination has to be made regarding what the game is. Is it the violent game it's always been or somthing else?
 
Advertisement
Just put horse blinders on all our players. Any time another team blocks us, they’ll get flagged for a personal foul because it’s out of the field of vision.

No problems with this rule whatsoever /sarcasm
 
I always felt I got cheap shotted when I was on the receiving end ; and always felt I got away with a cheap shot when I was the one delivering the hit. It's a good rule four players safety and a bad one four the spectators in the stands who ain't getting their bell rung.
That’s a great answer..yes as fans we love it..it pumps the team up, the fans up everyone..but it’s not a necessary play to keep the “integrity of the game”. The crack back block is a thing in the past and should be. The game will be fine without it.

Just like when they changed the target area for defenses to hit. Our team and others (Seattle Seahawks) proved you can play within those rules and still play physical fast football if you adapt to the changes and teach the correct technique
 
When you have a rule where the ref has to guess whether a player saw somebody coming, the ref literally has to determine what somebody else’s eyes saw, it’s just nothing but trouble
Yea, there’s gonna be flag happy refs not getting clear views of the infraction and making bad calls. However, the change to the targeting calls I believe is an improvement with not defaulting to as the call stands when no sufficient video footage is available.
 
Advertisement
So if we field an entirely blind team do we automatically win because no one is allowed to block us?

No field of vision = not allowed to touch

Such a stupid rule. Pussifing everything in this country.
 
It really depends on how referees are going to call it. The original "targeting" rule was overboard in that they automatically disqualified the player. Essentially guilty unless proven innocent. This year they changed it to a post review decision. If they can show obvious intent through review, the player is disqualified. A little more reasonable.
 
I always felt I got cheap shotted when I was on the receiving end ; and always felt I got away with a cheap shot when I was the one delivering the hit. It's a good rule four players safety and a bad one four the spectators in the stands who ain't getting their bell rung.
Dude. I've had my bell rung at least four times for Pete's sake.

Go Canes!!!!!!
 
Back
Top