It's more like 65% coaches fault - 35% players faults.
Players:
A lot of the players suffer from south florida diva syndrome. Don't put in the effort, mentally weak, think their star rating will do the work for them, post individual highlights on social media after losses, think they can out athlete opposing players (see james williams and his "tackling"), constantly making mental errors during games (Ex: stevenson INT, Special Teams blunders, etc). We lack more players like Restrepo, who just love the grind and to play. I really miss DeeJay Dallas. Pure athlete who wanted to compete and had fun while doing it. To me that is what we are lacking in some of the "evals". The coaches are doing evals of pure raw talent, but evals need to consider the 'gamer' and 'between the ears' aspects too. That should immediately help with the mentally weak aspects. You have to ask yourself how teams with absolutely no talent are able to beat us year in and year out, and then we get to watch them throw the U down over and over.
Coaches:
This current coaching staff is basically a dream team and an elite coaching staff (on paper) plus the addition of tons of analysts. It makes absolutely no sense that teams like MTSU or low level ACC basketball schools with brand new head coaches can beat us this badly at home. There's just no logical way that should ever happen or makes sense. We could take a star off of every single player on the roster and should still have more talent than Dukes roster. Duke is literally lucky to get ONE 4 star recruit each year. Let that sink in. The coaches are making too much money and have far too good of resumes to be this mediocre. It is the coaches jobs to develop the talent that they do have. I don't get how the majority of the evals and recruiting classes can have this many misses? How are multiple coaching staffs getting fooled? All the recruiting services also? Program has got to be cursed.
Back to the coaches: coaches at other programs making a fraction of what we pay coaches are putting teams together that show up to compete and perform respectively and they do this regularly. Sure once great teams like VT, Nebraska, and Tennessee (prior to this season) have struggled for a while, but then you also have teams that overperform really. The Syracuse's of the world. ****, even Mizzou gave Georgia a **** of a game and they are pretty awful. Somehow that is never us. Somehow we aren't the team that ever overperforms, but is a perennial underperformer. Take Wisconsin, I don't really see them ever winning a natty, but they are also a very strong team, where 7-5 should be the floor and a NY6 bowl win is the ceiling. I don't see them ever losing to a team like MTSU at home though? Seems like yeah other teams sometimes drop games, but never as many "head scratchers" like we do?
It is the coaches job to scheme to your players and get the best out of your players. The ACC is a very soft conference, especially the coastal, there is no reason we shouldn't be winning the coastal every year, at minimum.
I fell for it this offseason...the influx of quality coaches and analysts and money being poured into the program. Surely we would have been an 8 win team at minimum. Surely...
Would love to be a fly on the wall in the coaches meeting room.
Sorry if this doesn't make sense, been drinking since the 2nd half hours ago lol
tl;dr
-the coaches are at fault because they are literally making millions to coach up D1 scholarship athletes, no matter who's recruits they were. The cupboards being bare is a BS excuse, because even with bare cupboards this team should have walked MTSU and comfortably beat Duke. I can see being in dogfights with NC, etc, but there is no excuse, no passes, for losing to MTSU....at all; let alone AT HOME.
-The players are also at fault because they are mentally soft and aren't gamer types. What's sad is you can see it before it happens (ex: Bubba Bolden dying his hair blonde coinciding exactly with his decline)