The Holes After The Beatdown…

CaneTheGaytors

Biletnikoff Award Winner
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
7,123

Attachments

  • IMG_3652.jpeg
    IMG_3652.jpeg
    93.4 KB · Views: 0
Advertisement
That play was no different than any other play. The zebras didn't call holding penalties during the course of the game against FSU. Had they, there would have been a penalty every other play. How could there not be one holding penalty the entire game against the FSU, especially since the photo illustrates the rule rather than the exception?
 
Advertisement
I didn't see a beat down. We were lucky at the end.
Guess that's a context thing. That game wasn't a beat down you're absolutely right. Because they didn't even show up. We took them to the shed and then said that's enough and just crawled out the door. The issue Mario and Dawson have is they don't have enough confidence in this offense to say keep your foot on they neck and **** the risk. We literally ran four different plays in repetition the entirety of the 4th quarter. Than people act surprised we did nothing on offense and the defense struggled. That's what exhaustion does to you. But don't think for a second any of that had to do with the semenholes and their game plan. It was literally all reactive. Is what it is. You call it luck. I'd say maybe learn a lil more about what you're watching.
 
Advertisement
Guess that's a context thing. That game wasn't a beat down you're absolutely right. Because they didn't even show up. We took them to the shed and then said that's enough and just crawled out the door. The issue Mario and Dawson have is they don't have enough confidence in this offense to say keep your foot on they neck and **** the risk. We literally ran four different plays in repetition the entirety of the 4th quarter. Than people act surprised we did nothing on offense and the defense struggled. That's what exhaustion does to you. But don't think for a second any of that had to do with the semenholes and their game plan. It was literally all reactive. Is what it is. You call it luck. I'd say maybe learn a lil more about what you're watching.
Outta curiosity what part of it do they not have confidence in?
 
Outta curiosity what part of it do they not have confidence in?
You know I **** with you brother. But I'm just gonna say Nope and pass on that one. If I remember correctly you're a military man right? If so use your brain on that one and assess the risk and the manner that the military would. If you know you have the capacity to bomb the s*** out of somebody with zero risk opposed to sending in ground troops repetitively and taking losses why would you not account for the risk? One thing is a given while the other is a lesser probability due to the fact it has variance.
 
You know I **** with you brother. But I'm just gonna say Nope and pass on that one. If I remember correctly you're a military man right? If so use your brain on that one and assess the risk and the manner that the military would. If you know you have the capacity to bomb the s*** out of somebody with zero risk opposed to sending in ground troops repetitively and taking losses why would you not account for the risk? One thing is a given while the other is a lesser probability due to the fact it has variance.
Look at this ole wise *** dude. I was hoping he slipped up and answered
 
Back
Top