Targeting?

joseermonfils

Senior
Premium
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
3,746
I don’t know what targeting is?

I clearly thought that hit on Langham was targeting I’m confused
 
Advertisement
Of course it was. We didn't get the call. F*ck the ACC. But that wasn't the reason we lost. BC wanted it more and their offensive game plan in the first half was masterful against a **** good defense. We have no answer on O. That's it.
 
Advertisement
Of course it was. We didn't get the call. F*ck the ACC. But that wasn't the reason we lost. BC wanted it more and their offensive game plan in the first half was masterful against a **** good defense. We have no answer on O. That's it.

We had no business winning that game, but that’s a penalty any other time.
 
Amazing how they tried to avoid that like the plague...

Cut to a long *** commercial.. we come back their in the middle of running the play and the commentators just kinda shuffle the feet of the explanation and move on
 
May have been but ... Langham was double covered. Why'd Rosier go to him?

And he threw it head height. At least put it up in the air and let the much bigger WR go get it.

Regarding the hit, I thought it was a football play and I wouldn't have called it on the field. But watching the replay, we've seen hits like that get called for a couple years now. I don't always like it, but for the sake of consistency that had to be a targeting call.
 
Yes Corch Richt has clearly been targeting the fan base, hitting us upside the head with that terrible fvcken offense. I’m concussed.
 
ACC refs have no consistency in their calls. Last week MJ ejected for targeting on a hit that was a lot less egregious. Whatever, but that is not what lost Miami the game.

Mork playcalling and Manny getting worked by Scott Lefler were.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was. He was defenseless and the defender made helmet to helmet contact.

Throwing a fade on 4th down is a terrible call, yes I’m aware it worked against FSU but still a very risky throw. It was also terrible execution.

Either way we weren’t winning. I was sitting on my couch laughing when we went wildcat again in the same exact situation. A good OC calls a counter off of that or finally use DJ to throw it out of wildcat.
 
Advertisement
5 times worse then the Bandy hit. The receiver Bandy hit didn’t even know he got hit in head. Langham on the other hand was almost knocked out. ***** the ACC.
 
Canes will never get this call to go their way. This was on coach Richt last night not having guys ready. I think team has checked out. Duke could pull the win next week. Banners will go out then for sure.
 
There seems to be a real lack of consistency in the targeting call. The defender didn't lead with the crown of his helmet but he definitely blasted him helmet to helmet and he was defenseless. The ref announcer tried to say the defender didn't launch. Huh? The defender ran full speed into Langham? Don't understand the call at all.
 
Back
Top