- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 36,632
Take the school provided transportation and STFU you bunch of entitled puzzies.
The school has a legal responsibility to itself and can’t coddle babies that don’t know how to handle their booze.
Students can still get to games the same way they always have.
Students can drink, if they choose to do so, like they always have. They just can’t do it anymore in a University sanctioned special area set aside just for them. Makes sense from a liability standpoint. It’s a grownup world with grownup rules, kiddies. Nobody wants to assume liability for your fūcked up and irresponsible behavior, nor should they have to.
Get your sorry asses to the game.
Don’t drink and drive.
Drink responsibly if you can’t handle your liquor or don’t drink at all.
Welcome to the real world, motherfūckers, where actions have consequences.
I get your general sentiment about responsibility but it seems like the school is eschewing theirs here- not even to the students but to the image/liability concerns they initially sought to protect.
Wasn't the idea of herding all the students together in separate lots designed TO keep tabs on them? What I bet happened is that they weren't satisfied with the police acting as drinking age monitors and now have decided just to wash their hands of the student lot idea. Think that's going to work out better in the liability/image column as kids just scatter across various lots and their binge drinking blends in even better?
Like I said, the school just needs to accept reality while also doing the best to cover their own asses. This seems way too shortsighted and hamfisted.
Pretty sure all this was run through University counsel and this is what they came up with.
If you have a better ideas, let the school know.
But sorry, not feeling it for entitled brats not getting their safe space to get blind drunk in. Which is what they’re are asking for.