stop it ... some context is needed

[ageezy]

oregon lost because of untimely to's that gave points right away or led to incredibly short fields ... oh, and dante moore aint it

 

[ageezy]

another point, carson hasn't had that clean of a shot get home on him ALL YEAR ... man miss me ... gameday can't get here fast enough

 

[407cane]

Nah Indiana was always gonna beat them

It got UGLY because of what you mentioned

 

[ADELPHI]

Context be damned! The gurus have spoken and it's supposedly going to be 50-7 IU at the half.

 

[CaneMutiny06]

Nah Indiana was always gonna beat them

It got UGLY because of what you mentioned

Yup. Indiana is simply a better team and that showed up in the first matchup.

The margin was exaggerated by the numerous turnovers in Oregon’s own red zone. My guess is that without those catastrophes, Indiana would have won by a similar number as the first game.

 

[IRememberSchnelly]

Seems to me Moore fattened up his stats on Oregon's Stay Puft marshmallow man opponents. He'll get eaten alive in the NFL.

 

[Canedog]

Oregon is soft, just like their coach. Canes ain’t soft. Gonna be a slug fest.

 

[DoctorKrazey]

Seems to me Moore fattened up his stats on Oregon's Stay Puft marshmallow man opponents. He'll get eaten alive in the NFL.

He needs another year in college. Indiana disguises their coverage extremely well which is why he struggled so bad last night. It also, just so happens, to be the type of defenses he’ll be facing every week in the NFL.

 

[M3N]

Lanning is a fake tough guy. Can’t stand that prick

 

[CanefaninBuckeyeland]

OP and these comments are spot on. IU is definitely the better team than Oregon, but not THAT much better. But everyone will be prisoners of the moment and crown IU based on this one win. Oh, and miss me with the Alabama nonsense. They were a bad team that never should have been in the CFP anyway.

 

[BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati]

I realize it doesn’t work like this, but without the turnovers, that game was 14-7 to start the second half. Instead it was 35-7 and Oregon quit. I’m not sure how people can conclude much more than A) Indiana was very opportunistic last night, B) Indiana executes at an extremely high efficiency, C) Indiana got all the lucky bounces last night (see Mendoza fumble on the scramble that IU recovered) and most importantly, D) Oregon completely embarrassed themselves in both execution and heart. They looked like a 14 year old who just got to 3rd base for the first time. My conclusions:
Indiana is very good and Oregon played awfully.

PS. I saw that IU vs Penn State game and haven’t forgotten it. IU was very lucky to win that day. They’re beatable. It will take a very clean game from us, but we can beat them. We should own the LOS.

 

[MedleyCane]

Oregon is soft, just like their coach. Canes ain’t soft. Gonna be a slug fest.

They are a bunch of Nike adoring C$nts.

 

[MarkyMark]

I realize it doesn’t work like this, but without the turnovers, that game was 14-7 to start the second half. Instead it was 35-7 and Oregon quit. I’m not sure how people can conclude much more than A) Indiana was very opportunistic last night, B) Indiana executes at an extremely high efficiency, C) Indiana got all the lucky bounces last night (see Mendoza fumble on the scramble that IU recovered) and most importantly, D) Oregon completely embarrassed themselves in both execution and heart. They looked like a 14 year old who just got to 3rd base for the first time. My conclusions:
Indiana is very good and Oregon played awfully.

PS. I saw that IU vs Penn State game and haven’t forgotten it. IU was very lucky to win that day. They’re beatable. It will take a very clean game from us, but we can beat them. We should own the LOS.

Check out the Iowa game. Hopefully we can replicate what they did on defense.