Disgustipated
Sophomore
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2014
- Messages
- 3,621
Its not on Feeley.Pope, Wiggins, Harley, and a lot others still don’t look physically developed. Is that on them or on Feeley?
Its not on Feeley.Pope, Wiggins, Harley, and a lot others still don’t look physically developed. Is that on them or on Feeley?
I mean..the fact they ppl are pointing out WRs one of which came in 5’9 155 if that..another who was 6’3 maybe 175..I guess Dee is supposed to be 205-210 and Mike should be 5’9 195..but honestly tho..why is this a discussion lolI dont think you actually saw these kids in high school then.
View attachment 112960
View attachment 112961
View attachment 112962
they've always been tiny and they will always be on the smaller side because its just not possible for them to put up too much weight plus they're speed guys so you cant fatten them up. but to say they have had 0 development is nuts.
It's the players. Remember Al Golden's horrible s&c, but Denzel Perryman was ripped. I know some of it is genetics. I can't name one player on our defense that looks physically imposing.
I'm referring to on the football field. When I look at past pics of DJ Williams, Vilma, Blades, Rolle, Andre Johnson on game day in pads they look like dudes.
Same thing with Redding at receiverYou want swole/ripped players, you recruit swole/ripped players.
Generally the 4/5 star kids are the ones who arrive to the program most physically impressive. We seldom sign those kids.
Restrepo is already in better shape than all of our WR's. Surely yall don't think his S&C at STA and Deerfield was better than Miami's. Same applies to Lingard when he got here.
some people body is just meant to put weight aj green type wrThese freshman WRs look pretty college ready, physically
Wiggins on the other hand, **** still so skinny