meh. Most of the points are off base or "well duh"...
I think most sites only count the top 25 commits in a class, signing 30 guys isn't gonna increase the point total.
On the 247 composite... If the 5 guys listed in the article got those projected bumps, it will only be another 25-30 points increase. Shaq, Bruce, and Allison are already pretty high on the 247 composite, so Bumping them all to 5 stars only adds about 16 points.
Byrd and Jackson getting bumps to low 4 star adds about another 15-20 points. Those low ranked guys getting re-ranked is what will help, so with what Geo is saying maybe finishing top 5 is possible, but not without winning.
Regarding jumping FSU... If, Shavar Manuel, Mullens, and Craig-Meyers go to FSU, that is another 90 points, and thier lowest ranked recruit is Kier Thomas (who has a Bama and UGA offer), so they will get some bumps in the re-rankings too. Catching FSU simply isn't' gonna happen because teams always get a big recruiting bump the year after a National Championship. Keeping the "missile gap" close this year would be great for the next staff though.
Also, the "kids getting bumps when they commit to big schools theory" is an exaggeration. It happens to a degree, but something like 11 out of the last 12 National Champions had a 4 year averaged consensus top-5 class the year they won. The hard data doesn't fit the conspiracy theory.
If the big pay-sites are just handing out high rankings to big schools, then they are also coincidentally picking the National Championship winners 3-4 years in advance. So unless they have telepathy or something, how can that be explained if the rankings aren't relatively"accurate"????????????????????????????
And Jamel Cook is only a 4 star on 247, after dominating in a camp, so that and Scarllet aren't exactly a great example for that "bump theory".