forums

Speed difference at the skill positions

Problem2

Problem2

All-American
Premium
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
19,522
Worse then the OL (lol, finally got Kaaya killed. Nice going Corch Kehoe).

The speed difference at the skill positions shows how big the gap is between Miami and every other elite program in the country. Our guys looked like they were running in quick sand. It's gonna take multiple recruiting classes to fix Gorlden's transformation of this program into a slow, meddling Iowa south. Thanks, Al.
 
Advertisement
Huh? Coley, Waters, Scott are plenty fast on the outside.....Artie Burns is a track all american, and Elder might be fastest guy on D. Also, Bush is very fast for a safety. Only place we lack speed is probably RB.
 
Problem2 said:
Worse then the OL (lol, finally got Kaaya killed. Nice going Corch Kehoe).

The speed difference at the skill positions shows how big the gap is between Miami and every other elite program in the country. Our guys looked like they were running in quick sand. It's gonna take multiple recruiting classes to fix Gorlden's transformation of this program into a slow, meddling Iowa south. Thanks, Al.
Click to expand...

Yea lets lol Kaaya getting killed really ******* hilarious op. Dip ****
 
BigCaneAl said:
Huh? Coley, Waters, Scott are plenty fast on the outside.....Artie Burns is a track all american, and Elder might be fastest guy on D. Also, Bush is very fast for a safety. Only place we lack speed is probably RB.
Click to expand...


They ain't Clemson fast.
 
BigCaneAl said:
Huh? Coley, Waters, Scott are plenty fast on the outside.....artie Burns is a track all american, and Elder might be fastest guy on D. Also, Bush is very fast for a safety. Only place we lack speed is probably RB.
Click to expand...

The processing speed of the head coach and defensive coordinator isn't too good.
 
Problem2 said:
BigCaneAl said:
Huh? Coley, Waters, Scott are plenty fast on the outside.....Artie Burns is a track all american, and Elder might be fastest guy on D. Also, Bush is very fast for a safety. Only place we lack speed is probably RB.
Click to expand...


They ain't Clemson fast.
Click to expand...

This has got to be sarcasm. The issues we had were not related to speed....more about still not knowing how to play a read option etc.
 
We are slow at linebacker. Thats the main spot it see it.

Coley, berrios, burns, elder, bush. Are all fast.
 
I think it's in our front seven more than anything. We used to be so ******* fast side line to side line. Perimeter plays used to be futile. Stretches, tosses and options were wasted downs. We are fat, slow slobs up front. We also have no depth in the back four defensively, have limited athleticism and are terrible at recognizing routes and threats in their zones. We play 15 yards off of a team that completes 70% of their passes under 10 yards and then look like Simple Jack trying to make a play in space. We play base 3-4 with 3 god**** back up linebackers against a team that hasn't seen a WR it doesn't like, highlighting our concrete legged players even more. It's a ******* disgrace.
 
Advertisement
Phillyc55 said:
Vegas new how bad the talent was on this team predicted 5-6 wins
Click to expand...

Knew last year too, predicting 6-7 wins. Ended up as one of top schools for draft picks in 2015. I'll go ahead and take a stab that oddsmakers predict wins on the overall team, not just the players. Gtfoh
 
crossover22[]_[];2331856 said:
We are slow at linebacker. Thats the main spot it see it.

Coley, berrios, burns, elder, bush. Are all fast.
Click to expand...

We play a lot slower than we are physically....Grace is very fast. One caveat, Crawford may be the slowest safety in division 1 football.
 
BigCaneAl said:
Huh? Coley, Waters, Scott are plenty fast on the outside.....Artie Burns is a track all american, and Elder might be fastest guy on D. Also, Bush is very fast for a safety. Only place we lack speed is probably RB.
Click to expand...

And LB. Dallas Crawford ran a 5+ 40 and he's on the field way too much. I think the speed is there, but with Clemson's athletes and a depleted LB core, how are we not running a nickel the entire game? Getting the extra DB on the field would have been great. Obviously we didn't score but our D would have been much better off. Too bad a guy that has never been a DC like me can see that and our DC has no idea.
 
Phillyc55 said:
3rd-43 said:
Phillyc55 said:
Vegas new how bad the talent was on this team predicted 5-6 wins
Click to expand...

Knew last year too, predicting 6-7 wins. Ended up as one of top schools for draft picks in 2015. I'll go ahead and take a stab that oddsmakers predict wins on the overall team, not just the players. Gtfoh
Click to expand...

What?

Yea we had all those players with a true frosh qb
Click to expand...

Clemson's QB was a freshman last year... And hurt for over half of it...they only had 5 guys drafted... But our 2nd half defense is great. Gtfoh
 
jmccomber5 said:
I think it's in our front seven more than anything. We used to be so ****ing fast side line to side line. Perimeter plays used to be futile. Stretches, tosses and options were wasted downs. We are fat, slow slobs up front. We also have no depth in the back four defensively, have limited athleticism and are terrible at recognizing routes and threats in their zones. We play 15 yards off of a team that completes 70% of their passes under 10 yards and then look like Simple Jack trying to make a play in space. We play base 3-4 with 3 god**** back up linebackers against a team that hasn't seen a WR it doesn't like, highlighting our concrete legged players even more. It's a ****ing disgrace.
Click to expand...

This is the truth, well put
 
Advertisement
Back
Top