Off-Topic Space, the final frontier, these are the voyages of NASA

How do you propose we get to titan in any way that matters without first getting to Mars?
Honestly bro, I’m kinda at the point with space travel where I’m like, “wake me up when inter-dimensional or wormhole travel becomes more than theoretical for the human race.” When our current propulsion technology conservatively has us taking 60,000+ years to reach the nearest star system(Proxima Centauri) the task almost seems pointless/futile doesn’t it?
 
Advertisement
Obviously, there are no perfect solutions in our solar system, but Titan does have an extremely thick atmosphere which gives it a huge one-up over Mars, IMO. The extreme cold is a huge issue, but any planet, or moon, without an atmosphere is an automatic deal breaker for me. Also, it’s very cold on Mars also so not much advantage there. The amount of radiation early Mars travelers would have to contend with is a huge issue.
Agreed. But in both scenarios humans will have to live almost entirely indoors or underground. The gravity issue is the one that will require more adaptation.
 


Ok, now this is interesting. Scientists have supposedly found a “quantum tunnel”, or bubble, which connects our solar system to the Centaurus Constellation. This would basically work in the same way a wormhole would.
 
Next Couple weeks should be cool in Spaceflight

- Blue Origin launching maiden flight of New Glenn, and will try to recover/land as well. Given their entire company philosophy which has been pretty slow and that they do have experience with landing vehicles (even if very much suborbital, they did have humans aboard which is far more impressive than SpaceX ever did with Starhopper or grasshopper), I give them pretty good odds to be successful all in all. However It's still unlikely imo, and as long as the launch and deployement (don't think they are launching real payload) is successful, thats a win period. This can have a big impact because New Glenn SHOULD be just a plain better product than Falcon 9 which has been THE global workhorse rocket that launches legit like 90%+ of all mass to orbit currently. HOWEVER.....

- Starship next test flight is about to happen soon, and it is finally using the new design which pushes the flaps back and out of the plasma path, so hopefully it actually doesn't burn through this time. We'll see how that goes. It's got probably thousands of other upgrades too - as does the launch tower, which I doubt will have an issue like the previous test that caused them to bail on the catch attempt. And they are finally going to "deploy a payload" which will be the Starlink Sat Simulators (so not real sats). This is critical cause If it all goes welll I can see them going to orbit with real Starlink Sats next. And only Starship can launch their newest generation Starlink sat which is like 20x more capable I believe. It's crazy. So while Blue Origin is launching New Glenn that could eventually kill off Falcon 9, SpaceX is going to be taking the next step with Starship that could absolutely fundamentally change the entire space economy completely given it is intended to be FULLY reusable.

Should be fun
 


Time doesn't actually exist...

At least not in the linear way in which we know it.

I believe the past is actually happening right now simultaneously with the present & the future.

Maybe at quantum levels....

But This is what AI says:

Physics of Time:
  • Thermodynamics: The Second Law of Thermodynamics posits an increase in entropy over time, defining an arrow from past to future. This temporal asymmetry provides empirical evidence for the passage of time.
  • Relativity: General Relativity describes time as a dimension intertwined with space, forming spacetime. Time dilation, where time measures differently under varying gravitational fields or velocities, has been experimentally confirmed (e.g., in GPS technology, atomic clocks, and particle accelerators).
  • Quantum Mechanics: While time appears symmetric in many quantum processes, the measurement problem introduces an arrow of time through wavefunction collapse. Quantum field theory treats time as an operator, similar to position in classical mechanics, though interpretations like the Wheeler-DeWitt equation suggest a timeless universe where time might be emergent.
  • Cosmology: The Big Bang theory implies a beginning of time, with cosmic microwave background radiation serving as a temporal marker. The expansion of the universe further supports a timeline where events are ordered causally.
  • Causality and Change: In physics, time's existence is inferred from the need to order events causally; if A causes B, A must precede B in time. This causality principle underpins all physical laws, requiring time for their formulation.
  • Measurement: Time is operationally defined by periodic physical phenomena (e.g., atomic clocks), providing a consistent metric for change, validated by the consistency of timekeeping across different physical systems.
Philosophical Underpinning: Philosophically, time might not be fundamental; some theories propose it emerges from more basic properties of the universe. However, within our current scientific framework, time is indispensable for describing physical processes, dynamics, and evolution of systems from quantum to cosmological scales.

In essence, while time might be a construct or emergent from deeper physical laws, its utility and necessity in physics are undeniable, evidenced by consistent experimental outcomes across various scales of nature.
 
Maybe at quantum levels....

But This is what AI says:

Physics of Time:
  • Thermodynamics: The Second Law of Thermodynamics posits an increase in entropy over time, defining an arrow from past to future. This temporal asymmetry provides empirical evidence for the passage of time.
  • Relativity: General Relativity describes time as a dimension intertwined with space, forming spacetime. Time dilation, where time measures differently under varying gravitational fields or velocities, has been experimentally confirmed (e.g., in GPS technology, atomic clocks, and particle accelerators).
  • Quantum Mechanics: While time appears symmetric in many quantum processes, the measurement problem introduces an arrow of time through wavefunction collapse. Quantum field theory treats time as an operator, similar to position in classical mechanics, though interpretations like the Wheeler-DeWitt equation suggest a timeless universe where time might be emergent.
  • Cosmology: The Big Bang theory implies a beginning of time, with cosmic microwave background radiation serving as a temporal marker. The expansion of the universe further supports a timeline where events are ordered causally.
  • Causality and Change: In physics, time's existence is inferred from the need to order events causally; if A causes B, A must precede B in time. This causality principle underpins all physical laws, requiring time for their formulation.
  • Measurement: Time is operationally defined by periodic physical phenomena (e.g., atomic clocks), providing a consistent metric for change, validated by the consistency of timekeeping across different physical systems.
Philosophical Underpinning: Philosophically, time might not be fundamental; some theories propose it emerges from more basic properties of the universe. However, within our current scientific framework, time is indispensable for describing physical processes, dynamics, and evolution of systems from quantum to cosmological scales.

In essence, while time might be a construct or emergent from deeper physical laws, its utility and necessity in physics are undeniable, evidenced by consistent experimental outcomes across various scales of nature.
Quantum Superposition
 
Advertisement
Bout 25 mins before Blue Origins New Glenn window begins.... But won't be surprised if it gets pushed back till friday.

E1: ****** a t-10 mins a wayward boat violated exclusion zone delaying time 30 mins.... Ffs

E2: Looks like they might really be lighting this thing in about 5mins

E3: Successfull liftoff! …. Legit looks like the slowest liftoff possible. Very low thrust to weight (~1.2 vs Falcon 9s ~1.5). Would be a cool launch to view live cause of that. Feel it longer. Plus the blue methane exhaust produces great mach diamonds.

Their livestream is kinda trash after seeing what SpaceX does with Starlink live views (and all the practice announcers have). They could take a massive leap forward in that department.

E4: See if they land booster now

E5: well doesn’t appear the landed the booster, but did reach orbit. Now they technically are the first Methane rocket to reach orbit. Starship could have if they wanted to but SpaceX chose not to in their testing regime…

But awesome result for Blue Origin.
 
Last edited:
Now Starship launch tomorrow at around 2-3 Pacific / 5-6pm est.

E1: T-4mins

E2: Great Booster Catch. But unfortunately looks like they lost the Ship early. Not too surprising given this is a very new design. Lots of changes.

Will be interesting to see if they reuse this Booster or not...

Breakup:


Yeah they're gunna have a delay for a mishap investigation for sure...
 
Last edited:
Tell me more about this Sun probe Nasa sent? Parker probe. I have always been way more fascinated with the sun, as opposed to other stars and planets in our system. It's fairly close, the source of all life on our planet. I always thought more sci fi books and movies should be about the sun. Sunshine I thought was an amazing movie, one element in particular that I did not like about the movie.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top