forums

Second back in this class

cookies said:
We would be better suited by continuity and using funds elsewhere.
Click to expand...

Okay but a lot of times it isn't our choice. Alot of times the players leave because they want to.

And also we don't know what the staff thinks of the Lyles and CWH.

I could see it going either way. But if we get more attrition than Fletcher, and definitely if we lose two, I could see us either going after one of the top backs or a rotational back.
 
we will continue to poke around on MJC, I dont care what anyone says. MJC and Spell are the type of guys Mario craves.
 
skeeter said:
Okay but a lot of times it isn't our choice. Alot of times the players leave because they want to.

And also we don't know what the staff thinks of the Lyles and CWH.

I could see it going either way. But if we get more attrition than Fletcher, and definitely if we lose two, I could see us either going after one of the top backs or a rotational back.
Click to expand...
Neither is the choice of us wanting a second back or not lol. If the staff knows three players are leaving then obviously they are going to recruit another or get a portal addition. Right now, nothing says they are pressed to get another.

We know the staff loves Lyle that’s why he keeps getting snaps lol.

Last cycle, at one point, we were fighting with Wisconsin (WI commit Amari Latimer who flipped to WVU) and Nebraska (Jamal Rule) for a second back and didn’t land either of them despite having Mallory in the tuck. That’s in addition to prioritizing Derrick Cooper ahead of Mallory AND Amari’s older brother Geimere having played for Terry Jefferson at Jacksonville State (transferred to Wisconsin then WVU; has 3 forced fumbles on the year).

Still; after striking out on all 3 ‘26 backs, they didn’t go to the portal to add one and have stopped recruiting Myson Johnson-Cook and K. Spell (from what has been reported). In the ‘24 cycle, we lost Kevin Riley to Alabama and never replaced him or took two RBs in ‘25.
 
cookies said:
Taking a second HS RB isn’t going to fortify the RB position cuz it’s already fortified. Whoever it is, will have a tough time getting carries no matter what considering Mallory + Marty bare minimum and extremely unlikely event Lyle/Pringle/CWH all transfer. We would be better suited by continuity and using funds elsewhere.

Pringle wasn’t even used during the first five games of last season lol a whole lotta weeks left for the guys in the room to get carries.

Taking a portal back basically dooms Marty’s return and maligns the returning backs + incoming freshmen.
Click to expand...
You need a stable of RBs. They get injured a lot (generally more than CBs, although this year is crazy with our CB's health).

You don't know who's coming back and you don't know if Marty will return to his previous form. Pringle, Lyle, and CWH could all leave.

IMO we need to bring in two H.S. guys and also possibly portal in someone.
 
Combo said:
You need a stable of RBs. They get injured a lot (generally more than CBs, although this year is crazy with our CB's health).

You don't know who's coming back and you don't know if Marty will return to his previous form. Pringle, Lyle, and CWH could all leave.

IMO we need to bring in two H.S. guys and also possibly portal in someone.
Click to expand...
Well said. Depth in RB room is critical over a long season as physical position & guys take a beating. Also, difficult knowing what we’ll have returning between potential portals & Marty’s injury status.
 
Back
Top