When it comes to the absolute cream of the crop in college football it all comes down to who has the best players. Yes, innovative coaches can make a difference but if you don't have the same caliber athletes as your opponent, most of the time, you'll lose. We've seen it for years when teams like Oklahoma and Oregon got to the championship game only to get trounced by SEC teams loaded with NFL talent. Clemson wasn't able to hang with the big boys until they started getting superior talent on their lines and even then they needed an incredible quarterback to get passed Alabama. You get the best players, you get a chance to win titles. Even then, you're not immune to losing to lesser talented teams. Ohio State got blown out by Iowa. Is anybody there wondering if Urban is the right guy to get them another title? Alabama and Georgia both lost to an Auburn team that lost 4 games. It happens.
If you look at every team that has won a title in the last 20 years, the common denominator isn't quality coaching, it's superior talent.
This. And of course Richt can win a title. In fact, I give him as good a chance as any coach we could have hired, probably a better chance, because I'd say he knows exactly what his team needs to look like in order to have a chance to get past a top tier SEC team. He is trying to get it to where it needs to be. And to your point about Clemson, I agree, and I think that is the route this team is going to have to take. I don't see Miami as the kind of team that is going to win titles with game managers at QB. We are going to need a dynamic elite QB to get it done...I'm pretty convinced of that.