- Joined
- Jul 21, 2016
- Messages
- 5,567
Pretty pathetic that it takes losing to GT for the 2nd year in a row and some award snubs to get this team focused on the business at hand
Pretty pathetic that it takes losing to GT for the 2nd year in a row and some award snubs to get this team focused on the business at hand
Are you 4 years old?
Okay true. I think position matters also. I don't necessarily like keeping a QB in for these situations but if we had someone with heisman potential at WR.... I wouldn't mind.Only reason I would say no, is because if we lose Cam to injury trying to pad stats we’re ****ed. If Colorado loses Travis to injury padding stats then he still goes 1st round and they’re still out of the playoffs regardless. Us winning the ACC and a playoff game is more important for our program overall.
Yes and we did earlier in the season during our easier games. Cam would still be in when we were up by 30 in the 4th quarter.I'm all for padding stats. Wouldn't y'all do the same??
The only expectation I have is that they’re setting cam up to win the heisman.
Explain why?While I’m a huge Cam fan and bleed Green And Orange, the Heisman is supposed to go to the BEST college football player and, sorry, but there is no doubt that Travis Hunter deserves it this year.
I actually forgot all about this lolYes and we did earlier in the season during our easier games. Cam would still be in when we were up by 30 in the 4th quarter.
If we win today and Cam was to throw for 400 yards and 4 touchdowns then he would sky rocket right to the top again.
Don’t see Hunter winning it, a 2-way player hasn’t won it in over 20 years plus.No he wouldn’t. It would probably secure him getting invited to New York, but Hunter and Jeanty secured the one and two spots yesterday without question. Not saying that’s right, but it’s true.
Pretty pathetic that it takes losing to GT for the 2nd year in a row and some award snubs to get this team focused on the business at hand