Saban's impact: The millionaire asst. coaches club

Martycane

Sophomore
Banned
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
1,001
From The New York Times

Assistant Coaches Join the Millionaire’s Club
By ROBERT STRAUSSFEB. 12, 2016
Photo

The huge growth in college football assistant coaches’ salaries has been attributed to Nick Saban, head coach at the University of Alabama since 2007.



Bill Belichick is said to be the highest-paid coach in professional sports, with a salary estimated by Forbes at more than $7.5 million a year. To many, the pay is justified, given his four Super Bowl wins for the New England Patriots.

But back when he got started as an assistant coach for the Baltimore Colts, Belichick made a measly $25 a week — just about the going rate.

“Assistant coaches weren’t even looked upon as full-time employees,” said Ray Didinger, a Pro Football Hall of Fame writer and a broadcaster for Comcast’s SportsNet Philadelphia. “They worked in the season, and when the season was over, they went back home and were substitute teachers or assistant salesmen or beer distributors.”

Things are far different today. Take Kenny Payne. He is making $500,000 a year, including bonuses, as an assistant basketball coach at the University of Kentucky. That is about the same he made as a player in the high-paying National Basketball Association in 1993, the last of his four seasons as a small forward for the Philadelphia 76ers, a year in which he averaged 6.5 points per game.

But even Payne’s salary is modest compared with what some major-college football assistant coaches are paid. According to USA Today, which does an annual survey of collegiate assistant coach salaries, nine assistants at N.C.A.A. Division I football programs made more than $1 million last year, topped by Will Muschamp, the Auburn defensive coordinator, who made $1.6 million and has since taken the head coaching job at the University of South Carolina. Two assistants at Louisiana State University, Cam Cameron, offensive coordinator, and Kevin Steele, defensive coordinator, made $1.5 million and $1 million, respectively. (Steele has now taken Muschamp’s job at Auburn.)

The emergence of such princely salaries for non-head coaches at the pro and collegiate levels coincides with the vast sums flowing to sports in recent years. The N.C.A.A. men’s basketball tournament, for example, has taken in $740 million a year in TV revenue since 2011, up from $500 million a year from 2001-10, and the other major sports have seen similar rises.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

When Amateur Ironmen Pay for the Elite TreatmentFEB. 12, 2016
The Choices That Led Small Business Owners to WealthFEB. 12, 2016
A Savvy Breed of Winemaker Takes Business Sense to the WineryFEB. 12, 2016
Gilbert M. Gaul, author of “Billion-Dollar Ball: A Journey Through the Big-Money Culture of College Football,” links inflation in college football assistant coaches’ salaries to Nick Saban’s arrival as head coach at the University of Alabama in 2007, after coaching the National Football League’s Miami Dolphins. Alabama last month won Saban his fourth national championship as head coach of the Crimson Tide.

Photo

Kenny Payne made $500,000 last year as an assistant basketball coach at the University of Kentucky. Credit Joe Robbins/Getty Images
“He told Alabama, ‘If you want me to come, you have to invest,’” said Mr. Gaul, who added that Alabama’s football budget grew from $16 million in 2006 to its current $45 million.

Wealth Special Section
Articles on managing fortunes, improving lifestyles and finding financial security.
The Choices That Led Small Business Owners to Wealth FEB 12
When the Supposed Experts Lead Buyers Astray FEB 12
When Amateur Ironmen Pay for the Elite Treatment FEB 12
A Savvy Breed of Winemaker Takes Business Sense to the Winery FEB 12
For Some, It’s Time to Look Overseas Again FEB 12
See More »

“A part of that was that he wanted to pay assistant coaches so they would come to Alabama,” Mr. Gaul said. “He was used to a pro system, with intense, specialized assistant coaches.”

According to USA Today, Alabama paid its 10 assistant coaches — the most allowed by the N.C.A.A. in Division I — a total of $5.2 million last year.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story
Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

For his book, Mr. Gaul tried to compare men’s football and basketball coaching salaries with women’s collegiate sports budgets. “A good women’s rowing program may cost $1.2 million total — coaches, facilities, travel, whatever,” Mr. Gaul said. So that entire program would cost less than a year’s pay of any of seven assistant football coaches in the millionaires’ club. Assistant coaches in sports like softball or even men’s cross-country might make $30,000 or $40,000 a year.

The lucrative assistant coaching market helps explain why Steve Kauffman of Kauffman Sports Management Group in Malibu, Calif., who was Payne’s agent as a player, has shifted his agency’s specialization to coaches and front-office personnel. But another factor in the agency’s shift, and in coach salary inflation, is, ironically, the player salary cap in the N.B.A.

Photo

As the defensive coordinator for Auburn University’s football team, Will Muschamp earned $1.6 million last year. Credit Michael Chang/Getty Images
N.B.A. teams must limit what they pay players, but there is no cap for everything else. Thus, teams can pay assistant coaches as much as they want, and have as many as they want. Mr. Kauffman pointed to the Charlotte Hornets, where his clients are the head coach, Steve Clifford, and three of the Hornets’ six assistant coaches, including the Hall of Famer Patrick Ewing. In another era, the bench would not be the place for such a star, but with salaries averaging about $800,000 for top assistants, it’s a good place to be.

“It might seem like a lot to have six or seven assistants for a team of 12 guys, but players can expect personal attention these days,” said Mr. Kauffman, noting that paying a six-figure salary for an assistant to help protect a billion-dollar investment — which a sports team often is these days — is not a lot.

He said that last year the Hornets hired the former all-star shooter Mark Price, now the coach at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, primarily to help Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, a star who makes $13 million a year, reform his jump shot. “It has made the market for assistant coaches who have a reputation all the more lucrative.”

Even with the more-than-comfortable salaries now available to assistants, most still aspire to become head coaches, said Mr. Didinger, the writer and commentator.

“There may be some who don’t want the hassle of dealing with the media or the fans and just want to stay in the background,” Mr. Didinger said. “Sometimes there is someone who loves being an offensive coordinator or a special-teams coach, but in reality, most of the people who come to the N.F.L. want the opportunity to be the face of the franchise.

“I can’t imagine it is any different in college,” he said, “even if they can make a salary unheard-of only a generation ago.”
 
Advertisement
I find Alabama's dynasty quite boring. Don't get me wrong it's impressive what they have accomplished and will probably go down as the greatest run in CFB.

But something about it is boring to me. The plug and play of coaches and players, etc. The element of excitement just isn't there
 
I find Alabama's dynasty quite boring. Don't get me wrong it's impressive what they have accomplished and will probably go down as the greatest run in CFB.

But something about it is boring to me. The plug and play of coaches and players, etc. The element of excitement just isn't there

Pretty easy to understand.

They in no way overcame any obstacles the way we did in our long run....they purchased away any obstacles from a coaching and recruiting perspective.

The sad reality is that their approach will be the most repeatable in the future.

UM
 
NVA, it's boring because you have no vested interest in it. I'd bet most would say our run was boring as well. Obviously not to us, but whatever.
 
NVA, it's boring because you have no vested interest in it. I'd bet most would say our run was boring as well. Obviously not to us, but whatever.

They say that about us because we weren't supposed to do it, and they didn't like us rubbing back in their faces after decades of abuse.

UM's run was anything but boring, whether you loved or hated us.

UM
 
NVA, it's boring because you have no vested interest in it. I'd bet most would say our run was boring as well. Obviously not to us, but whatever.

They say that about us because we weren't supposed to do it, and they didn't like us rubbing back in their faces after decades of abuse.

UM's run was anything but boring, whether you loved or hated us.

UM
They just did two 30 for 30s on the program. I'm sure Bama will get theirs, but it won't be anywhere close to as interesting.
 
This is why the NCAA's "competitive balance" mandate is such a joke. Professional sports saved themselves with lockouts/threats of lockouts that forced salary caps and allowed the Royals to at least compete with the Yankees, the Packers with the Cowboys, The Islanders with the Rangers, etc.

In college sports, the coaching salaries, facilities, etc. are the $$$$ advantage (leaving out the bagman and the new student stipend battle in the Power 5). Analogous to a salary cap is an athletic department budget cap determined by number of sports and graded by expense of an area (i.e. Miami is more expensive an area than Starkville Miss.)

Barring this, the 'Bama's, O$Ucks, UMich, UTexas, etc. of the world will eventually win out ("victory goes to the bigger battalions") and CFB will be effectively a battle between roughly 20 or so teams supported by ESPN, Fox, etc. It will be boring, interest will plummet and the golden goose will eventually die due to greed at the win at all cost schools and their willing TV accomplices (trying to limit $$$ spent on rights fees).
 
I was surprised to read that there are agents who specialize in assistant coaches.
It's a niche field with increasingly lucrative rewards...Question is what did Auburn really get for the $1.6 mil it spent for Muschamp.
 
Advertisement
I find Alabama's dynasty quite boring. Don't get me wrong it's impressive what they have accomplished and will probably go down as the greatest run in CFB.

But something about it is boring to me. The plug and play of coaches and players, etc. The element of excitement just isn't there

I agree 100%
I've talked to buddies about this. Sure, they are talented, but they have no swagger, nothing that really defines them, other than their Napoleon complex coach. Bama is like a paint by numbers football team.....they are so methodical that it is boring. Also, for as successful as they have been, none of their Saban teams will be mentioned as an all time top 5 College football team.
 
This is why the NCAA's "competitive balance" mandate is such a joke. Professional sports saved themselves with lockouts/threats of lockouts that forced salary caps and allowed the Royals to at least compete with the Yankees, the Packers with the Cowboys, The Islanders with the Rangers, etc.

In college sports, the coaching salaries, facilities, etc. are the $$$$ advantage (leaving out the bagman and the new student stipend battle in the Power 5). Analogous to a salary cap is an athletic department budget cap determined by number of sports and graded by expense of an area (i.e. Miami is more expensive an area than Starkville Miss.)

Barring this, the 'Bama's, O$Ucks, UMich, UTexas, etc. of the world will eventually win out ("victory goes to the bigger battalions") and CFB will be effectively a battle between roughly 20 or so teams supported by ESPN, Fox, etc. It will be boring, interest will plummet and the golden goose will eventually die due to greed at the win at all cost schools and their willing TV accomplices (trying to limit $$$ spent on rights fees).

Nice rant, but nothing has changed. The big powerhouse schools used to have a ton of players on the rosters so other schools couldn't get them before scholarship reductions.

20 or so teams, that's pretty much the way it's always been. I would estimate that right around the number of teams who have won a national championship in the last 50 years.
 
I find Alabama's dynasty quite boring. Don't get me wrong it's impressive what they have accomplished and will probably go down as the greatest run in CFB.

But something about it is boring to me. The plug and play of coaches and players, etc. The element of excitement just isn't there

It's taken away a lot of my interest in the sport. What's the point if at the end of every season it's just another picture of Nick Saban holding an NC trophy? With the kind of money, facilities, and favorable treatment by the NCAA regarding gifts and payments to players, how can anyone else compete? Even other $EC teams struggle to keep up with Bama, and we know Turdland and other schools in this conference cheat like crazy. Sport belongs to a bunch of snaggletoothed knuckledragging hillbillies and rednecks anymore.

Incidentally, I wonder how well the kids playing for these teams would be treated by these hayseeds if they couldn't play football? As is, it's basically like The Good Old Days Down South during football season with these kids basically being seen as prized "bucks" just like it's 1860 again. Only difference is they give them cars, houses for Mom, and all the hookers they want.

At least THIS TIME, the slaves get paid!
 
Last edited:
I find Alabama's dynasty quite boring. Don't get me wrong it's impressive what they have accomplished and will probably go down as the greatest run in CFB.

But something about it is boring to me. The plug and play of coaches and players, etc. The element of excitement just isn't there

It's simple, buy a better football program, kids make nothing, University spends $45MM, makes sense.
 
NVA, it's boring because you have no vested interest in it. I'd bet most would say our run was boring as well. Obviously not to us, but whatever.

I've never heard anyone refer to our good teams as boring. That's probably the worst possible adjective for any of our NC teams.
 
Advertisement
NVA, it's boring because you have no vested interest in it. I'd bet most would say our run was boring as well. Obviously not to us, but whatever.

I've never heard anyone refer to our good teams as boring. That's probably the worst possible adjective for any of our NC teams.

Our great TV ratings in the good years prove that people didn't consider us boring...
 
[video=youtube;oaOLX87TQNQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaOLX87TQNQ[/video]
He's 100% correct. It's a plug and play system that doesn't have any personality. I imagine when they do a 30 for 30 on these Alabama team's most of the focus will be on saban and how he ran things and did things. It's boring and frankly it's bad for the sport.
 
NVA, it's boring because you have no vested interest in it. I'd bet most would say our run was boring as well. Obviously not to us, but whatever.

I've never heard anyone refer to our good teams as boring. That's probably the worst possible adjective for any of our NC teams.

Our great TV ratings in the good years prove that people didn't consider us boring...
There was nothing boring about our teams. They were filled with individual players that had great or interesting personalities. They were fun and played an exciting brand of football.
 
I find Alabama's dynasty quite boring. Don't get me wrong it's impressive what they have accomplished and will probably go down as the greatest run in CFB.

But something about it is boring to me. The plug and play of coaches and players, etc. The element of excitement just isn't there

not to mention the players and coaches have zero personality and seem miserable all the time. also it's not as exciting when a team is basically being bought
 
Back
Top