That's a straw man, not one single person has argued that Jarren was equal or better than Hurts & you know that.
You can't leave play calling out because it's literally the most quintessential aspect of scoring the ball, you can't act like all things being equal that Enox's offense would've been as potent as a Lincoln Riley's so how on Earth can you move that huge elephant from the discussion?
Oklahoma has better players & had a significantly better offensive system than we had last year, so, it's without question that Hurts wouldn't have been able to duplicate the same season he had at Oklahoma as he had at Miami because he wouldn't have had the weapons or the offense to do so.
Would he have been better than Jarren, obviously, that goes without saying, but to act as if Hurts in Enox's Pro style bro Central Michigan offense would've been as good as he was with Riley in Oklahoma is ridiculous lol.
We probably wouldn't have went 6-7, but even with Hurts we're not winning more than 8 games while running Enox's offense.