Rutgers BOT has more balls than UM’s

The law school has been mired in the second tier forever. The year I was admitted a letter went out to all admitted students announcing that they were lowering the number of students in entering classes dramatically over the following 5 years to increase academic ranking (I think it was supposed to be something like a 25% reduction). Never happened.

At least Donna had the undergrad rankings moving. Now if you're a Florida resident and you can go to the 57th ranked university for $7k per year (fsu), why would you go to the 57th ranked university for $60k per year (miami)?


What year are you talking about? I do know that UM Law got rid of the "night section", which did cut overall numbers.

Everyone knows that Miami is a "small private school" of only 8,000 full-time undergrads. Yet when I was at UM Law (1993-96) Miami was the seventh largest law school...IN THE COUNTRY.

Screwed up. Especially now that the State of Florida has added a bunch of state-funded law schools.

UM Law should be under 900 students at any given time (not counting LL.M.s).
 
Advertisement

One of the reasons why they want the AD out is “because of lack of competitiveness of the football team.” UM loses to fiu and duke and um bot is silent.

well when you have some of your boosters with names like Luigi "Baby Shanks" Mannochio things seem to get done (or else).
 
What year are you talking about? I do know that UM Law got rid of the "night section", which did cut overall numbers.

Everyone knows that Miami is a "small private school" of only 8,000 full-time undergrads. Yet when I was at UM Law (1993-96) Miami was the seventh largest law school...IN THE COUNTRY.

Screwed up. Especially now that the State of Florida has added a bunch of state-funded law schools.

UM Law should be under 900 students at any given time (not counting LL.M.s).

Entered in '98.
 
I brought this up previously. Academic rankings (particularly US News & World Report) are heavily reliant upon "selectivity". Miami only takes (APPROXIMATELY) 3,000 undergrads each year. If 3,000 people apply, then you have 100% acceptance and 0% rejection. If 100,000 people apply, then you have 3% acceptance and 97% rejection. A school like Harvard gets a ton of applicants every single year, no matter how the football team does. But Miami has shown that when our football team does well, our number of applicants skyrockets.

Therefore, as much as a "true academic" would prefer to deny it, a good football program can actually have a large impact on academic rankings, at least ones that rely on the selectivity index of the Admissions Office.

It is not surprising that our academic rankings have slid as our football team has sucked. The combination of high tuition and "not enough good reasons (i.e., great football team) to apply to Miami" have conspired to kill our upward academic ranking trajectory. Meanwhile, the State of Florida continues to grow, thus the "good" state schools (UF and F$U primarily, but UCF and USF more recently) are benefitting from "increasingly selective admissions" as these big schools can only take so many admissions, and the applicant pool continues to grow each year.

I can assure you, there is NO ACADEMIC PROGRAM that is causing F$U to "rise" in the academic rankings, and there is nothing that Shalala or Frenk (I really don't like him) have done to decrease Miami's academic ranking...

EXCEPT...

For our football team tanking for the past 15 years.

The undergrad rankings were consistently on the rise under Donna, which coincided with the decline of the football program. I don't think there is a correlation between athletics and academics one way or the other. See USCw.
 
Back
Top