Purely speculating, but my guess is that Miami saw some concerns with their running game in the first part of the season but looked at the rest of the schedule and figured they were more than big enough to handle the ACC defensive lines.For a personnel standpoint in the first 4 to 5 games coaches seem to be happy with the running attack, but I just think that it’s become too predictable and opposing coaches are betting their hedges that we won’t change it up
Don't think any of us were overrating Marty Brown when we picked him up. We were happy to get him, but thought he would be RB3 after Lyle and FletcherIt’s a combo of OL overrated and RBs overrated.
For example, Marty Brown…. It’s a reason he was at North Dakota before coming here!
The few types that we pulled our guards with Mauigoa, we had our most explosive runs. When we try to run the ball up the middle, is when we struggle. It’s been the same thing all season long. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the running game could be way better with better play calling, and the passing game as well.After watching yet another pathetic attempt by Miami to run the football with consistency, especially against a team that is mostly terrible, I am left wondering if the play calling is less of an issue than the personnel. I am not trying to absolve Dawson (and Mario) and think that part of the job of any coaching staff is to recognize when you don't have the personnel and scheme up success in spite of that. But given that the same rushing attack was the best in the country last year, I am having trouble reconciling that fact with what I am watching every week.
Sure, the play-calling has been a little stale and sure, the threat of Cam Ward passing made a difference last season and sure, the lack of respect for our current passing attack (especially without CJ Daniels) allows teams to focus on the run more. But even if we ran up the A gap on every single play, we should still have been able to generate more success against ******* Syracuse of all teams.
I am just having trouble laying all of the blame at the feet of the coaching staff when we have a massive and veteran offensive line and three (probably overrated) veteran running backs. I guess we could throw in a little variety and a few more outside runs, but after watching the line and Lyle today, do we really think that a stretch play wouldn't get blown up in the backfield 5 times out of 10?
Unfortunately, the best pieces on our offensive line are probably gone next year and the recruit at running back (Mallory) looks like more of the same. I guess we can rely on Pringle a bit more but he is small and doesn't look like a three-down stud.
What is my point? I don't think we need to be calling for Dawson's head. I think we need to learn from how badly the staff misevaluated what we had upfront and in the backfield and hopefully make some corrections.
The ideal scenario would be a talented FR or Rs FR to be your third running back.Don't think any of us were overrating Marty Brown when we picked him up. We were happy to get him, but thought he would be RB3 after Lyle and Fletcher
So far, Marty has been our 2nd best Rb behind Fletcher and he's been our best RB out of the backfield as a receiver. He seldom goes down on 1st contact and typically makes positive yardage. His skillset is limited, but I think he's getting the most out of it. We overrated Fletcher and severely overrated Lyle.
I had mentioned a couple weeks ago that we need to run more play action.We don't run any play action on early downs.
This and the lack of variety at the mesh point are my biggest gripes in terms of playcalling. I know Beck isn't exactly a burner but he is at least athletic enough to keep the defense honest.We don't run any play action on early downs.