MikeyCanez
Sophomore
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2018
- Messages
- 551
After watching yet another pathetic attempt by Miami to run the football with consistency, especially against a team that is mostly terrible, I am left wondering if the play calling is less of an issue than the personnel. I am not trying to absolve Dawson (and Mario) and think that part of the job of any coaching staff is to recognize when you don't have the personnel and scheme up success in spite of that. But given that the same rushing attack was the best in the country last year, I am having trouble reconciling that fact with what I am watching every week.
Sure, the play-calling has been a little stale and sure, the threat of Cam Ward passing made a difference last season and sure, the lack of respect for our current passing attack (especially without CJ Daniels) allows teams to focus on the run more. But even if we ran up the A gap on every single play, we should still have been able to generate more success against ******* Syracuse of all teams.
I am just having trouble laying all of the blame at the feet of the coaching staff when we have a massive and veteran offensive line and three (probably overrated) veteran running backs. I guess we could throw in a little variety and a few more outside runs, but after watching the line and Lyle today, do we really think that a stretch play wouldn't get blown up in the backfield 5 times out of 10?
Unfortunately, the best pieces on our offensive line are probably gone next year and the recruit at running back (Mallory) looks like more of the same. I guess we can rely on Pringle a bit more but he is small and doesn't look like a three-down stud.
What is my point? I don't think we need to be calling for Dawson's head. I think we need to learn from how badly the staff misevaluated what we had upfront and in the backfield and hopefully make some corrections.
Sure, the play-calling has been a little stale and sure, the threat of Cam Ward passing made a difference last season and sure, the lack of respect for our current passing attack (especially without CJ Daniels) allows teams to focus on the run more. But even if we ran up the A gap on every single play, we should still have been able to generate more success against ******* Syracuse of all teams.
I am just having trouble laying all of the blame at the feet of the coaching staff when we have a massive and veteran offensive line and three (probably overrated) veteran running backs. I guess we could throw in a little variety and a few more outside runs, but after watching the line and Lyle today, do we really think that a stretch play wouldn't get blown up in the backfield 5 times out of 10?
Unfortunately, the best pieces on our offensive line are probably gone next year and the recruit at running back (Mallory) looks like more of the same. I guess we can rely on Pringle a bit more but he is small and doesn't look like a three-down stud.
What is my point? I don't think we need to be calling for Dawson's head. I think we need to learn from how badly the staff misevaluated what we had upfront and in the backfield and hopefully make some corrections.