forums

Rhett doing the ACC commish’s job

Advertisement
Empirical Cane said:
Here's the thing amigo...

According to Sankey and others, the rankings came out just right didn't they?

He's the Otto von Bismarck of college football and the rest (so far) are muppets...and I'm being kind.

Yormark (allegedly) is his match.

This is child's play to predict.
Click to expand...
How the SEC does anything is how the SEC does everything.

Did I get that right?
 
Fluffhead said:
This guy is such a moron that he doesn’t understand that’s part of the rig. It’s like when Vanderbilt beat an average Alabama team last year. They moved into the top 25 despite losing to Georgia State. Cycle continues when another team beats them.
Click to expand...
Most egregious last year was Mizzou. Played nobody and beat nobody of note. Somehow stayed ranked for almost the entire year. They were the cornerstone of Bama’s playoff argument. Their win over a “ranked” Mizzou put them as the team with the most ranked wins vying for that 12th spot.
 
All I know is, I love me some canes. As a college athlete a loooong time ago, I can't imagine what all these cats are dealing with. Money, ***** from every fing where. These are my dudes. Love 'em or leave 'em.
 
Three things:

Rhett the GOAT needs to get to work negotiating a new TV contract for the ACC.

How can ESPN change rankings when no games have been played? What are you basing that on?

Anyone talking about strength of schedule in the preseason is just making up **** because we all know **** well half the teams in the preseason top 25 won’t be there at the end of the year. Having a “tough” schedule before a single game has been played doesn’t mean anything.
 
Advertisement
Last years playoff discussion told you where this all is going.

Losses do not matter. Quality wins are all that matter. Unfortunately all of the quality teams are in the SEC and Bi10. When they lose conference games it is a non factor. Actually it is a feather in their cap for playing so many great teams.
 
DTP said:
Three things:

Rhett the GOAT needs to get to work negotiating a new TV contract for the ACC.

How can ESPN change rankings when no games have been played? What are you basing that on?

Anyone talking about strength of schedule in the preseason is just making up **** because we all know **** well half the teams in the preseason top 25 won’t be there at the end of the year. Having a “tough” schedule before a single game has been played doesn’t mean anything.
Click to expand...
Will be curious to see if Rhett stays on the Hill Top.

As was said...

Empirical Cane

Post in thread 'Miami prediction - Josh Pate'

Calinative said:
We can't lose 2 ACC Regular season games. Simple as that
Click to expand...
I'm not certain a 2-loss Miami* team gets invited to CFPO at all. B1G and SEC, I believe, are going to try and assert their dominance over the selection process this season and basically tell everyone, "so what *******".

Before any ***aloon(s) start with their bat**** hystrionics with mental equivalency of a toddler's meltdown, give me some space as I'm hungover.

😀

Really hungover.


*Any ACC team unless ACC Champ happens to have to Ls
 
CDWright40 said:
Last years playoff discussion told you where this all is going.

Losses do not matter. Quality wins are all that matter. Unfortunately all of the quality teams are in the SEC and Bi10. When they lose conference games it is a non factor. Actually it is a feather in their cap for playing so many great teams.
Click to expand...
Even when they get blown out by non conference teams (Florida) it doesn’t matter.
 
DTP said:
Three things:

Rhett the GOAT needs to get to work negotiating a new TV contract for the ACC.

How can ESPN change rankings when no games have been played? What are you basing that on?

Anyone talking about strength of schedule in the preseason is just making up **** because we all know **** well half the teams in the preseason top 25 won’t be there at the end of the year. Having a “tough” schedule before a single game has been played doesn’t mean anything.
Click to expand...

SOS should be irrelevant until the end of season when voting on final rankings and no rankings should come out until week 5. Preseason rankings are retarded and rig the system. Just because some moron thinks a team is good before the season shouldn’t influence “quality losses and wins” until games are played.
 
Empirical Cane said:
@CIS Al Bot are you going to take this?
Click to expand...
An AI chatbot is generally more useful than a moron, assuming "moron" refers to someone who’s consistently unhelpful or lacks critical thinking. An AI like me can process vast amounts of info, provide accurate answers, and assist with tasks 24/7 without getting annoyed or distracted. A moron might occasionally stumble into something useful, but they’re more likely to waste your time with nonsense or bad advice.
 
Advertisement
NC_Canes_11 said:
Most egregious last year was Mizzou. Played nobody and beat nobody of note. Somehow stayed ranked for almost the entire year. They were the cornerstone of Bama’s playoff argument. Their win over a “ranked” Mizzou put them as the team with the most ranked wins vying for that 12th spot.
Click to expand...
Yep or “we beat them when they were 18”… it’s absolute false circular logic.
 
ACC needs to start winning. Miami , Clemson and SMU --2/3 need to get in playoffs and win a game or two and then do it again next year --only then will the narrative change.
 
Back
Top