Proposed House settlement and NIL

Advertisement

This is the one I've been waiting for and have been *****ing about on here for the last year. We better hope they lose.

If a court rules in their favor schools are going to take a sledgehammer to their athletic departments.

Large athletic department's are going to have the same 20 million to pay players that smaller athletic depts will have. Fewer sports means more money going to fewer athletes.

They'll shrink them down to offer the minimum number of sports needed to be title IX compliant.

If they win their appeal, it will backfire. Schools will get rid of as many sports as possible (including theirs) and football will break away from the NCAA.

In the end private equity wins.
 
I think this will be bad for Miami. What we want is a wide open market with no rules. Anytime you put a committee in charge of saying which NIL deal is OK and which isn't, it's going to favor the SEC schools who will put their own people on that committee.

And any salary cap will only be honored by Miami. Schools like Alabama will offer bags under the table and if Miami tries to do the same thing, that enforcement committee will come after us (but let Alabama slide).

We've see it before. This is no good. Miami should refuse to sign.
Exactly. The bag game was ruined, we started to prosper in the open, now they want to be able to have the same privileged schools do the bag game again.

It's ridiculous.

No one had a problem with NIL until it started to benefit schools outside of Bama, UGA, Ohio St, Texas schools etc.
 
Proposed legislation in Mich that would ban schools within the state from complying with NIL investigations and prohibit schools from in the state reporting NIL deals to the new College Sports Commission/Deloitte.

 
Advertisement
Anyone hear how many football scholarships Miami will be doing?

Read somewhere some schools only offering 95
 
Advertisement

fsu being ********
“There's also a provision that, depending on how it's interpreted, could limit an athlete's right to counsel during any future negotiations.”

**** that. Why would anyone sign that?
 
Back
Top