If money is not a factor, there are other factors:
Relationships, location, development, tradition, conference, brand appeal, etc.
We won't be in the ACC after 2030 so not sure conference will be a hindrance for long.
With respect to the topic, like others have mentioned, the real issue to the sport is the transfer portal being open multiple times a year and every player having access to it to renegotiate as they please.
No other sport in America has a structure like that and for good reason. Instead of a NIL enforcement, I'd be more on board for limiting player movement.
The argument of but coaches move as they please doesnt do it for me (even though they pay a buyout). Every sport has a restriction on player movement because not having one is non-sensical.