- Joined
- Apr 28, 2014
- Messages
- 20,733
No I meant after he plays here... Once he plays here it doesn't matter what he did at Arizona.It's not a preconceived judgment.
ITS BASED ON HIS PLAY AT ARIZONA.
No I meant after he plays here... Once he plays here it doesn't matter what he did at Arizona.It's not a preconceived judgment.
ITS BASED ON HIS PLAY AT ARIZONA.
You are literally lyingWaste of breath bruh...same dudes thought we nailed the portal DBs last year too...
You literally need to take a lap....You are literally lying
You literally need to take a lap....
Well, 2024 has 1 day left@PIPO what happened to the yearly awards from last year? this would have made for a good one.
That's a significant upgrade over anything we have had under MarioUnreal with talent?
I think we need to pump the brakes a bit here.
Is Brantley a JAG in your eyes ?Have you considered that the only DB’s that want to play here, are JAGs?
Stop @MemnonIt's not a preconceived judgment.
ITS BASED ON HIS PLAY AT ARIZONA.
No Miami mention FYI.
Arizona CB Tacario Davis
Scheduled to visit Washington this week, a source tells On3 that Michigan, Miami, Ole Miss and Texas are all in the mix for Tacario Davis.
This is from less than an hour ago.
Dude was coming at everybody that’s been saying the same thing. I made one of the first posts when d$ put it out there. I watched a few of his games and kid was underwhelming and I said as much. Numbers only seem to matter when it’s building a narrative that suits certain people.I never said I was perfect & my comment I had nothing to do with my own personal view of EK.
My point was, you said people would still be *****ing about EK if we landed Tacario & I pointed out why people were *****ing about EK in the first place.
Here's the facts:
View attachment 315881View attachment 315882View attachment 315883View attachment 315884View attachment 315885View attachment 315886View attachment 315887View attachment 315888View attachment 315889View attachment 315890View attachment 315891View attachment 315892
That's not my personal opinion, that's the empirical data concerning EK.
How does someone watch his film & come away with anything other than what the data shows, is a work of mental gymnastics & trying to create a narrative in order to sell people on the idea of overlooking the data & the film.
There is no objective way to watch EK's film & come away with any other conclusion, it's simply not possible. So how does someone watch bad film & come away with a "positive" outlook on it?
That's all I'm saying. And that's why people are reacting that way, because it's commensurate to the actual play that they're seeing.
You notice how people didn't react that way when Brantley committed? Isn't it weird how pretty much the entire board thought it was a good pick up? You know why? Because there's proof in data & on film that he's actually a good CB.
You know why people have been feeling the opposite about EK, because there isn't any.