forums

Portal Whiffs

caneaddict

caneaddict

Senior
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
5,561
87 - gronk actor from Hernandez story show
52 - 5’11 250
6 - late game grind out guy, not at the level of 6 from last year
Receivers - nope
11- for the love of god do not throw 1 more ball to a spot with the game on the line , live to play another down and the 7 second pocket check down is either you or refer to receivers group
 
Advertisement
87 was meh at Tulane but CIS did their thing and convinced themselves that he was going to be a good one. I, for one, expected a great level of mediocrity out of that guy.

52 is a higher level of mediocre than 87

6 has his moments but not sure he belongs at the level we expect to play at

11 is stealing checks now that his cars were stolen
 
6 is fine.

He looked just fine against Notre Dame, and UF. He isn’t RB1, but he has more than enough ability to play here and be a significant contributor. His production, along with the entire offense in general, is tailing because teams are adjusting to us and we are doing nothing to counter. We are stubborn idiots, that think brute toughness overcomes everything so of course that isn’t sustainable.

The others I agree with. Bauman, and Brockermeyer are unplayable.

Beck is ***, but anyone calling for Emory is ******* lying to themselves and just wants attention lol.
 
Last edited:
htownkidd said:
6 is fine.

He looked just fine against Notre Dame, and UF. He isn’t RB1, but he has more than enough ability to play here and be a significant contributor. His production, along with the entire offense in general, is tailing because teams are adjusting to us and we are doing nothing to counter.

The others I agree with. Bauman, and Brockermeyer are unplayable.
Click to expand...
The problem is there are limited slots and if we are going to be a running team, we need a ******* BOSS *** RB.. It makes no sense to lean on run and then have avg backs to me.. We saw what Martinez was and right now off street he would still be best RB in room, we havent upgraded spot..

We got this guy and he is going to be here clogging up depth chart with 3 yard avg.. Bruhhhhhh
 
htownkidd said:
6 is fine.

He looked just fine against Notre Dame, and UF. He isn’t RB1, but he has more than enough ability to play here and be a significant contributor. His production, along with the entire offense in general, is tailing because teams are adjusting to us and we are doing nothing to counter. We are stubborn idiots, that think brute toughness overcomes everything so of course that isn’t sustainable.

The others I agree with. Bauman, and Brockermeyer are unplayable.
Click to expand...
Other than not being able to block worth a F, running slow and dropping balls, 87 is great!

He needs to be pushed into the flaming lava with the town virgin.
 
WRs nope? Come on now. CJ has the most TDs on the team beside Mali. This was actually a better overall portal haul. Agree on TE and the center.
 
The Center - whiff
The TE- Whiff
The QB- TVD Part II (Whiff)

The Bauman pick up made zero sense. A depth piece cool but to make him your blocking who occasionally catches passes is terrible
 
BigDikDaddyFromCincinnati said:
red-plastic-gallon-jerry-can-with-poison-sign-isolated-on-a-white-DTCE9J-2972607832.jpeg

11 - gtfoh and never come back. Or just eat cyanide. By the gallon.
Click to expand...
LOL...
 
Advertisement
Bauman pick up made no sense till you realize the TE position is void of playable players. Lofton has sunk to Bauman’s level or lower & the freshmen apparently aren’t ready to play.
 
htownkidd said:
6 is fine.

He looked just fine against Notre Dame, and UF. He isn’t RB1, but he has more than enough ability to play here and be a significant contributor. His production, along with the entire offense in general, is tailing because teams are adjusting to us and we are doing nothing to counter. We are stubborn idiots, that think brute toughness overcomes everything so of course that isn’t sustainable.

The others I agree with. Bauman, and Brockermeyer are unplayable.

Beck is ***, but anyone calling for Emory is ******* lying to themselves and just wants attention lol.
Click to expand...
we dont adjust our playbook as the year goes on. the tape is out on us the first weeks of the year and its not going to change.
 
Idk about whiff but Toure is a disappointment. Wtf happened to Bonner? How is Chasing Smith a better option?
 
Completely forgot about Bonner. Stanford was the first time I saw him on the field all year. Anyone with sense knew the deal there. He didn’t start at NCST, knew he wouldn’t be a factor here this season.
 
hoops156 said:
we dont adjust our playbook as the year goes on. the tape is out on us the first weeks of the year and its not going to change.
Click to expand...
Pretty much this. Cam was the diversity last season. He broke tendencies when he extended the play. With Beck the play calling deficiencies are not being covered up. The offense has become too predictable and teams aren't having any trouble taking away our bread and butter. TVD was a less accurate and dumber QB so this problem was maginified but it still exists and it is now causing Beck to "regress."

Im still a bottomline dude if Beck had IT this wouldnt be an issue, he would overcome a la Cam he is just avg though so hes having a lot of trouble. He is good enough to win with and if he was getting more help from the play sheet what talent he does have would show through.
 
Advertisement
htownkidd said:
Completely forgot about Bonner. Stanford was the first time I saw him on the field all year. Anyone with sense knew the deal there. He didn’t start at NCST, knew he wouldn’t be a factor here this season.
Click to expand...
That was not what was said after he committed. "Internal buzz" and "top 4" were the approved summer posts.
 
Back
Top