forums

Pat Narduzzi talks Miami game

Advertisement
Rellyrell said:
We absolutely win out.

Edit: Read @Liberty City El post after mine, and I’ve been humbled. Lol
Click to expand...
Nah bro you good lol!

We could win out, but it’s not likely...

I mean I wouldn’t bet the house on it if I was yall, we still have 2 potential losses on the schedule coming down the stretch & as long as Manuel Diaz is the HC there’s no guarantee we’ll win those games.
 
Liberty City El said:
Nah bro you good lol!

We could win out, but it’s not likely...

I mean I wouldn’t bet the house on it if I was yall, we still have 2 potential losses on the schedule coming down the stretch & as long as Manuel Diaz is the HC there’s no guarantee we’ll win those games.
Click to expand...
That’s a fact.
 
ThomasG954 said:
Yesss Pat, create expectations for Manny to not meet 🤝
Click to expand...
More....yesss pat, just cause you’re manny’s lil b&@$; and you’ve lost 3 to the worst acc coach in history....maybe fcs, I’m sure you’re hoping this is true

TVD gives us a chance every week but this is still a manny coached team so I would not be surprised if TVD throws 400 yards each game and we still lose due to our special teams, terrible d scheme and manny time outs/in game adjustments that help opposing teams.
 
Liberty City El said:
Lol I love how everyone is nervous that we’re gonna win out, yall are letting the emotional high of winning cloud your judgement...

1) Miami has not been blowing these teams out, in fact every single game we’ve won this year (except for the scrimmage vs Central Conn) has been a close one possession victory, we beat App St by TWO points, NC St by ONE point & Pitt by FOUR points, that’s a combined SEVEN points for 3 W’s, not to mention we have one of the WORST defenses in the Nation, not just the ACC but in all of college football.

2) Miami is still coached by Manuel Diaz, the same guy who lost to FIU & got shut out in a Bowl game 14-0 vs LA Tech IN THE SAME YEAR... Do yall really think this man is gonna lead us to an 8-4 record?? Lol

We’ll be lucky to finish 7-5 & probably lose in whatever Bowl game we get, every game left on our scheduled is losable, please don’t overestimate a couple close wins that took near perfect Herculean efforts by the Offense, regression to the mean is more bound to happen than us staying at this offensive peak we’re at right now.

What The Narduzzi was doing is called a Post hoc argument fallacy, Lawyer’s do it all the time, it’s way to appeal to a group of people (usually a jury, but in this case Pitt fans) by creating an otherwise false narrative in order to get yourself off the hook by coming to an assumed conclusion that actually has no connection to the original event that happened.

Meaning, he basically set up this narrative that we’re this brand new juggernaut that’s just now getting on a roll & isn’t really isn’t as bad as our record shows that we were coming into the game. It’s his only way to deflect the heat that’s coming his way for another Pitt let down season & to justify losing to a very poorly coached team that usually figures out a way to beat themselves.

The Narduzzi has been at Pitt for 7 seasons now & the best they’ve ever done under him is 8-5, which means they’re in permanent average college football purgatory, where you’re good enough to not get fired but never good enough to ever actually win anything of significance. Pitt fans & their Admin alike have run out of patience with The Narduzzi, which means he’s hit that fork in the road where being consistently average won’t cut it anymore & he’s lost the benefit of the doubt of having the excuses made for him.

Pitt this season in particular, has everything they need to go on a run & compete for the ACC, so The Narduzzi is just setting it up for their fans for when they eventually drop the ball & ***** everything up & end up 8-4.
Click to expand...
The voice of reason. Although the "We Byke" crew want to extend Manny because he finally figured out how to squeak out wins vs mediocre ranked ACC teams. You are 100% correct. My biggest fear is by beating those powerhouse Panthers Manny has already done enough for the BOT to get another year.
 
Liberty City El said:
Nah bro you good lol!

We could win out, but it’s not likely...

I mean I wouldn’t bet the house on it if I was yall, we still have 2 potential losses on the schedule coming down the stretch & as long as Manuel Diaz is the HC there’s no guarantee we’ll win those games.
Click to expand...
As usual we will save Justin Fuentes job
 
We already know Manny can beat Pitt and NC State. He’s done it before. That’s not the issue
 
Liberty City El said:
Nah bro you good lol!

We could win out, but it’s not likely...

I mean I wouldn’t bet the house on it if I was yall, we still have 2 potential losses on the schedule coming down the stretch & as long as Manuel Diaz is the HC there’s no guarantee we’ll win those games.
Click to expand...
The way the offense is playing I don't think they will let the D lose any of the remaining games.

This D scheme has to GO and NOW!!!
 
Advertisement
As said elsewhere, every Miami game - with the exception of Bama and C. Ct - has been a toss up. That goes for the loss to Mich State. So, very likely the remaining 4 games follow the same pattern. Guess here is Miami wins 3 of the last 4 & Manny survives to coach another year.
 
Someone needs to tell Mr. Narduzzi to run the tape again on the goal line call. Close call, but appears ACC officials surprisingly got it right.
 
Advertisement
Tru C said:
He is speaking to the Pitt fans, who want him to explain how they lost to a 3-4 Miami team.

In other words, “we really didnt lose to a 4 loss team, that team is much better than their record, so dont be too upset, that Miami team wont lose another game.”

Well coach, i hope yall lose to either Duke, UNC or Syracuse if we do win out! And UVA loses to either Pitt or Va Tech.

Le go! I want in! We want Wake! We want Wake!
Click to expand...


Bravo. Exactly what he's doing here.

Narduzzi isn't propping up Miami for Miami's sake—he's trying to justify why his one-loss, high-expectations team lost to a 3-4 Canes squad that was on the ropes and left for dead two weeks ago.

Every game is so winnable that you have to bank on Miami choking one away; as that's been the case the past 15 years with this program. (That said, could also win all four as they've already choked away their quota by starting 2-4 and ****ing away games to UVA and UNC.)

Feels like a stumble is coming, as past two wins are direct results of TVD going balls-out and having MVP like games—in narrow wins.

No power running game with Harris / Chaney out and Knighton getting most reps (mostly catching the ball in space)—any smart defensive guys out there put pressure on TVD, combined with Diaz's trash defense—a stumble in one of these "winnable" games isn't a stretch.
 
Liberty City El said:
Lol I love how everyone is nervous that we’re gonna win out, yall are letting the emotional high of winning cloud your judgement...

1) Miami has not been blowing these teams out, in fact every single game we’ve won this year (except for the scrimmage vs Central Conn) has been a close one possession victory, we beat App St by TWO points, NC St by ONE point & Pitt by FOUR points, that’s a combined SEVEN points for 3 W’s, not to mention we have one of the WORST defenses in the Nation, not just the ACC but in all of college football.

2) Miami is still coached by Manuel Diaz, the same guy who lost to FIU & got shut out in a Bowl game 14-0 vs LA Tech IN THE SAME YEAR... Do yall really think this man is gonna lead us to an 8-4 record?? Lol

We’ll be lucky to finish 7-5 & probably lose in whatever Bowl game we get, every game left on our scheduled is losable, please don’t overestimate a couple close wins that took near perfect Herculean efforts by the Offense, regression to the mean is more bound to happen than us staying at this offensive peak we’re at right now.

What The Narduzzi was doing is called a Post hoc argument fallacy, Lawyer’s do it all the time, it’s way to appeal to a group of people (usually a jury, but in this case Pitt fans) by creating an otherwise false narrative in order to get yourself off the hook by coming to an assumed conclusion that actually has no connection to the original event that happened.

Meaning, he basically set up this narrative that we’re this brand new juggernaut that’s just now getting on a roll & isn’t really isn’t as bad as our record shows that we were coming into the game. It’s his only way to deflect the heat that’s coming his way for another Pitt let down season & to justify losing to a very poorly coached team that usually figures out a way to beat themselves.

The Narduzzi has been at Pitt for 7 seasons now & the best they’ve ever done under him is 8-5, which means they’re in permanent average college football purgatory, where you’re good enough to not get fired but never good enough to ever actually win anything of significance. Pitt fans & their Admin alike have run out of patience with The Narduzzi, which means he’s hit that fork in the road where being consistently average won’t cut it anymore & he’s lost the benefit of the doubt of having the excuses made for him.

Pitt this season in particular, has everything they need to go on a run & compete for the ACC, so The Narduzzi is just setting it up for their fans for when they eventually drop the ball & ***** everything up & end up 8-4.
Click to expand...
If Narduzzi were to get canned I would love him here as DC. Big shift lately to 3-4 / multiple base but I still like an attacking 4-3 or 4-2-5 which he generally runs well.
 
Liberty City El said:
Lol I love how everyone is nervous that we’re gonna win out, yall are letting the emotional high of winning cloud your judgement...

1) Miami has not been blowing these teams out, in fact every single game we’ve won this year (except for the scrimmage vs Central Conn) has been a close one possession victory, we beat App St by TWO points, NC St by ONE point & Pitt by FOUR points, that’s a combined SEVEN points for 3 W’s, not to mention we have one of the WORST defenses in the Nation, not just the ACC but in all of college football.

2) Miami is still coached by Manuel Diaz, the same guy who lost to FIU & got shut out in a Bowl game 14-0 vs LA Tech IN THE SAME YEAR... Do yall really think this man is gonna lead us to an 8-4 record?? Lol

We’ll be lucky to finish 7-5 & probably lose in whatever Bowl game we get, every game left on our scheduled is losable, please don’t overestimate a couple close wins that took near perfect Herculean efforts by the Offense, regression to the mean is more bound to happen than us staying at this offensive peak we’re at right now.

What The Narduzzi was doing is called a Post hoc argument fallacy, Lawyer’s do it all the time, it’s way to appeal to a group of people (usually a jury, but in this case Pitt fans) by creating an otherwise false narrative in order to get yourself off the hook by coming to an assumed conclusion that actually has no connection to the original event that happened.

Meaning, he basically set up this narrative that we’re this brand new juggernaut that’s just now getting on a roll & isn’t really isn’t as bad as our record shows that we were coming into the game. It’s his only way to deflect the heat that’s coming his way for another Pitt let down season & to justify losing to a very poorly coached team that usually figures out a way to beat themselves.

The Narduzzi has been at Pitt for 7 seasons now & the best they’ve ever done under him is 8-5, which means they’re in permanent average college football purgatory, where you’re good enough to not get fired but never good enough to ever actually win anything of significance. Pitt fans & their Admin alike have run out of patience with The Narduzzi, which means he’s hit that fork in the road where being consistently average won’t cut it anymore & he’s lost the benefit of the doubt of having the excuses made for him.

Pitt this season in particular, has everything they need to go on a run & compete for the ACC, so The Narduzzi is just setting it up for their fans for when they eventually drop the ball & ***** everything up & end up 8-4.
Click to expand...
Would you say that Post Hoc Argument Fallacy is similar to Gaslighting? My attorneys are doing this to me right now regarding the distribution of the money they were able to recover from my lawsuit. They are using a glitch in the case that only myself and they know of (not the defendants) and using it as a basis for taking 95% of the settlement. Our retainer agreement basically reads that they have 100% say in how any recovered money or settlement is dispersed. I signed it, so I accept the terms, but its just Wild wild stuff to gaslight me like this. Just take the money, don’t insult my intelligence.

If anyone has advice on any forms of recourse in this matter feel free to do so.
 
HarrietTubmanCane said:
Would you say that Post Hoc Argument Fallacy is similar to Gaslighting? My attorneys are doing this to me right now regarding the distribution of the money they were able to recover from my lawsuit. They are using a glitch in the case that only myself and they know of (not the defendants) and using it as a basis for taking 95% of the settlement. Our retainer agreement basically reads that they have 100% say in how any recovered money or settlement is dispersed. I signed it, so I accept the terms, but its just Wild wild stuff to gaslight me like this. Just take the money, don’t insult my intelligence.

If anyone has advice on any forms of recourse in this matter feel free to do so.
Click to expand...
There is a zero percent chance they want the bar association involved. Also, if the retainer agreement reads like you say, they are going to get sanctioned. Tell them you want an accounting of the proceeds and read this:



I’m not a Florida lawyer so this isn’t legal advise. But don’t let anyone play with your paper.
 
Back
Top