No rationale. Maybe it was about keeping the offense in its usual rhythm vs. slowing it down and ******* up the offensive flow.
No rationale. Maybe it was about keeping the offense in its usual rhythm vs. slowing it down and ******* up the offensive flow.
Doesn't matter they weren't stopping us that last drive.
No rationale. Maybe it was about keeping the offense in its usual rhythm vs. slowing it down and ****ing up the offensive flow.
Actually I was not mad at that. It's simple we had no trust in our offense that we were going to score on the drive. So we wanted to hurry up and have time to get the ball back if Syracuse scored.
Also, Syracuse only needs 1 minute to score so it wouldn't of made too much of a difference. Plus we were catching them off balance because of up tempo they wanted us to slow it down and get in our heads. It worked great and am happy they did it against Syracuse, any other offense it would of been real bad
No rationale. Maybe it was about keeping the offense in its usual rhythm vs. slowing it down and ****ing up the offensive flow.
Obviously we ended up scoring and it broke in our favor, but what is the rationale behind leaving that much time on the play clock?
You wanted Homer to pull up and take a knee? He called a run play, what else do you want.
No rationale. Maybe it was about keeping the offense in its usual rhythm vs. slowing it down and ****ing up the offensive flow.
This is your answer. Like it or not, we aren't a slow, methodical, pounding offense. We rely on tempo and rhythm to move the football. Better to keep moving the ball and get a score than drain clock and not score.