our dbs

[mjl7atlas]

Show me a still shot of that. That’s all I’m asking for.

 

[919cane]

I've learned in this thread that if a DB intercepts a pass but the receiver is touching the ball as they go to the ground it's a catch.

 

[NC_Canes_11]

As I’ve been saying, nothing is clear. My opinion was it didn’t look like a clear pick to me.

The call on the field was gonna stand either way.

 

[Ryanmilli]

As I’ve been saying, nothing is clear. My opinion was it didn’t look like a clear pick to me.

The call on the field was gonna stand either way.

He is missing a nuance of the simultaneous catch rule. Even if there is simultaneous control (I don’t think there was because 0’s hands came off the ball) the player who hits the ground first wins.

 

[flips]

You couldn’t see it, but what u can see is Bryce hands comes off that ball multiple times in the air and on the ground, you can also see his arms moving which would indicate he’s trying to pry the ball away, who do you think he was trying to pry the ball from?

it looks like to me he lost control on the way down and the fight for the ball looked to hard for me, so somebody had to have their hands on it. if the ball was a lose as yall say it was he should have easily been able to bring it to his chest.

I get what you're saying seeing some of these replays, but they called it an INT on the field, so I think they were right not to overturn it, since the refs really shouldn't be extrapolating. Had they called it a TD on the field they would have kept it as a TD on review I think. Most importantly **** FSU.

 

[NC_Canes_11]

He is missing a nuance of the simultaneous catch rule. Even if there is simultaneous control (I don’t think there was because 0’s hands came off the ball) the player who hits the ground first wins.

You can’t see the ball when either of them hit the ground.

 

[Bender]

Did you become a Canes fan in 2024?

I've seen the Patriots in 2023 and 2024. That should suffice.

 

[clg003]

"Miami DBs are top notch"

 

[twes.305]

I get what you're saying seeing some of these replays, but they called it an INT on the field, so I think they were right not to overturn it, since the refs really shouldn't be extrapolating. Had they called it a TD on the field they would have kept it as a TD on review I think. Most importantly **** FSU.

I agree, **** FSU. I am happy that they called it int on the field and I knew it was going to stand. I’m just saying we got a little lucky and I think there’s a bigger issue at hand, lack of attention to detail from our DBs. A wins a win though, I’ll take it.